H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anastasija Sevastova vs Nadia Petrova H2H: 1-0 (incl. walkovers)

Anastasija Sevastova vs Nadia Petrova: 0–0 excluding walkovers; 1–0 including 1 walkover. Across 1 main-draw results including walkovers, Anastasija Sevastova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anastasija Sevastova won the 2010 China Open third round W/O.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anastasija Sevastova
Latvia Age 36 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H including walkovers
1 – 0
1 main-draw results
Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anastasija Sevastova #55 (w/o) Nadia Petrova #17 Match data Oct 7, 2010* R16 China Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anastasija Sevastova #499 #11 3,366 1,956 209 178 54.0% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,089 444 278 61.5% 0 3 1 5 4 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anastasija Sevastova Nadia Petrova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0
17 2007 1–1 50.0% #261 1,510 0 0 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,567 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0
19 2009 5–9 35.7% #79 1,531 0 0 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0
20 2010 22–15 59.5% #45 1,699 0 1 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,745 0 0
21 2011 12–18 40.0% #98 1,622 0 1 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,921 0 0
22 2012 0–1 0.0% #184 1,605 0 1 2004 40–25 61.5% #12 1,879 0 0
23 2013 2–2 50.0% #148 1,618 0 1 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,971 0 1
24 — — — — — — — 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,999 0 6
25 2015 5–3 62.5% #113 1,650 0 1 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,918 0 7
26 2016 22–19 53.7% #34 1,713 0 1 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,925 0 9
27 2017 37–24 60.7% #16 1,821 0 2 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,824 0 9
28 2018 44–22 66.7% #11 1,918 0 3 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,852 0 9
29 2019 27–22 55.1% #27 1,759 0 4 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,786 0 10
30 2020 1–9 10.0% #54 1,649 0 4 2012 39–19 67.2% #12 1,933 0 13
31 2021 17–18 48.6% #70 1,712 0 4 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,725 0 13
32 2022 1–2 33.3% #680 1,699 0 4 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,656 0 13
34 2024 4–2 66.7% #481 1,712 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2025 9–11 45.0% #188 1,722 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anastasija Sevastova Nadia Petrova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
17 2007 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 8 5 13 61.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 2009 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 8 11 19 42.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 2010 11 8 19 57.9% 11 6 17 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
21 2011 12 12 24 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 20 11 31 64.5% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 2012 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 28 16 44 63.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2013 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 34 17 51 66.7% 15 5 20 75.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 28 16 44 63.6% 15 1 16 93.8% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4%
25 2015 2 1 3 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 20 11 31 64.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 0 4 100.0%
26 2016 10 10 20 50.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2008 34 17 51 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2017 16 15 31 51.6% 15 7 22 68.2% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2009 17 13 30 56.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
28 2018 26 14 40 65.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2010 17 14 31 54.8% 12 4 16 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
29 2019 10 13 23 43.5% 13 7 20 65.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2011 18 13 31 58.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2020 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 20 11 31 64.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — —
31 2021 9 12 21 42.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2013 7 7 14 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
32 2022 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 2024 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 5 5 10 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 113 106 219 51.6% 73 51 124 58.9% 23 19 42 54.8% 0 2 2 0.0% — 264 170 434 60.8% 107 62 169 63.3% 51 28 79 64.6% 22 18 40 55.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 369/387 of Anastasija Sevastova's and 414/630 of Nadia Petrova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anastasija Sevastova Nadia Petrova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2007 2/2 1.0 2.0 68.6% 61.0% 55.0% 52.2% 50.3% 59.0% 49.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 13/14 1.9 3.8 57.7% 60.9% 42.7% 46.5% 52.6% 53.4% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 34/37 1.9 3.1 59.7% 61.0% 48.4% 50.1% 50.5% 56.0% 44.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 29/30 2.6 3.0 60.2% 61.2% 43.4% 43.8% 50.6% 54.3% 42.8% 2003 12/56 3.7 3.3 56.6% 70.3% 47.3% 61.6% 49.4% 60.0% 51.0%
22 2012 1/1 0.0 0.0 80.0% 25.0% 0.0% 50.0% — 20.0% 28.6% 2004 10/65 4.7 4.2 56.8% 69.4% 49.1% 44.6% 40.1% 60.7% 44.9%
23 2013 4/4 5.3 6.3 52.3% 63.4% 47.3% 53.4% 39.7% 55.6% 41.3% 2005 22/81 3.9 3.4 60.3% 69.7% 48.9% 61.7% 50.8% 61.3% 47.2%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 50/67 5.1 2.7 61.5% 71.4% 51.1% 58.4% 48.2% 63.7% 47.6%
25 2015 5/8 1.8 2.4 59.9% 62.4% 47.5% 49.0% 51.4% 56.2% 43.7% 2007 49/55 4.4 3.1 61.8% 71.9% 48.2% 58.1% 47.0% 62.6% 45.1%
26 2016 39/41 2.1 2.6 56.4% 64.3% 45.3% 57.0% 48.6% 56.1% 43.1% 2008 63/71 4.7 3.7 60.3% 70.4% 44.7% 57.0% 53.9% 60.4% 45.5%
27 2017 61/61 2.1 2.3 61.2% 63.4% 47.9% 48.5% 54.1% 57.3% 45.3% 2009 47/51 6.2 3.7 58.3% 70.3% 46.5% 50.8% 44.7% 60.2% 42.2%
28 2018 62/66 3.0 2.2 60.8% 66.3% 47.8% 52.6% 50.3% 58.9% 46.2% 2010 47/52 6.2 3.3 57.1% 71.5% 48.2% 63.1% 51.9% 61.5% 43.1%
29 2019 48/49 2.5 2.0 58.8% 64.8% 50.3% 52.2% 46.3% 58.7% 44.1% 2011 41/46 4.2 3.0 58.5% 66.6% 48.1% 55.9% 52.2% 59.1% 42.1%
30 2020 10/10 2.4 2.3 60.0% 55.3% 43.1% 43.3% 31.6% 50.7% 37.0% 2012 45/58 6.0 3.0 55.3% 70.5% 46.7% 51.0% 48.8% 60.0% 44.4%
31 2021 33/35 1.9 2.8 59.4% 62.1% 46.7% 54.4% 52.0% 55.9% 44.3% 2013 22/22 6.3 3.0 60.4% 67.2% 41.1% 51.9% 43.8% 57.1% 44.5%
32 2022 3/3 2.7 2.7 64.0% 64.6% 38.9% 27.2% 34.9% 55.7% 41.1% 2014 6/6 5.3 5.5 46.7% 66.9% 45.9% 48.3% 39.9% 54.2% 42.2%
34 2024 6/6 1.2 1.5 69.3% 65.6% 49.5% 45.5% 53.6% 60.6% 49.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 19/20 2.3 3.2 65.5% 60.6% 40.7% 52.1% 38.7% 53.4% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 369/387 2.3 2.6 60.1% 63.1% 46.7% 50.7% 49.1% 56.5% 44.1% — 414/722 5.2 3.3 58.9% 70.2% 47.3% 56.2% 49.0% 60.8% 44.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anastasija Sevastova Nadia Petrova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1536 108.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.10 2–0 1–1 — -0.21
17 2007 1510 107.3 +0.28 -0.88 1.201 53.9% — — — 60.0% +1.60 0–1 0–1 — -0.14 1999 1568 119.8 — — — — +27 — — 38.9% -1.06 1–1 1–0 — -0.10
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1625 137.4 — — — — +80 -140 -67 48.4% +0.27 4–8 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 94.3 -0.47
19 2009 1532 109.5 -0.95 -1.06 0.905 47.8% +22 -5 — 37.5% -0.72 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.37 2001 1683 138.0 — — — — -59 -20 -54 49.4% +0.35 5–6 (45%) 2–11 (15%) 96.0 -0.89
20 2010 1700 136.1 +0.52 +1.27 1.013 50.4% -18 -56 — 50.0% +0.10 10–4 (71%) 5–3 (63%) 112.0 -1.72 2002 1745 137.3 — — — — -48 — — 59.1% +0.68 1–1 1–1 — -1.69
21 2011 1623 125.8 -0.67 -0.46 0.936 48.5% +20 -35 — 47.7% -0.23 2–7 (22%) 5–4 (56%) 93.7 -1.25 2003 1922 156.8 +3.29 +4.32 1.277 55.5% -51 -85 -174 61.1% +0.92 11–9 (55%) 6–2 (75%) 105.2 -2.56
22 2012 1606 — -4.79 -0.63 0.357 26.3% — — — — — — — — -0.02 2004 1880 151.4 +3.04 +0.66 1.141 52.4% +11 -49 -143 61.4% +1.02 8–11 (42%) 7–7 (50%) 95.7 +1.78
23 2013 1618 108.8 -1.89 -0.55 0.931 48.2% +29 — — 44.4% -0.56 1–0 1–0 — -0.36 2005 1971 156.3 +4.70 +2.81 1.221 54.3% -26 +29 -176 69.4% +1.41 13–10 (57%) 7–6 (54%) 102.6 +1.08
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1999 165.0 +7.12 +3.75 1.310 55.6% -34 +105 — 70.3% +1.75 9–6 (60%) 7–4 (64%) 102.2 +2.64
25 2015 1651 116.6 -0.45 +1.55 0.997 49.7% +20 -58 — 63.2% +0.10 1–2 (33%) 4–0 (100%) 103.0 +0.37 2007 1918 152.6 +6.15 +2.04 1.205 53.8% +19 +124 -43 68.2% +1.44 9–3 (75%) 7–7 (50%) 101.3 -0.25
26 2016 1713 129.3 +0.55 -0.36 0.984 49.6% -12 -43 -134 53.9% +0.07 5–4 (56%) 5–2 (71%) 104.2 -0.43 2008 1926 146.0 +4.49 +1.77 1.149 53.0% -16 +1 +21 66.9% +1.29 7–11 (39%) 9–5 (64%) 94.7 +0.54
27 2017 1821 142.6 +0.98 +2.00 1.060 51.3% -53 -13 -127 58.1% +0.59 9–7 (56%) 4–9 (31%) 102.4 +0.20 2009 1825 141.7 +4.11 -1.32 1.060 51.1% +14 +37 +87 54.4% +0.50 14–8 (64%) 8–6 (57%) 100.8 +1.28
28 2018 1918 151.6 +2.10 +3.32 1.125 52.4% -17 -8 -182 60.1% +0.74 17–7 (71%) 8–8 (50%) 106.2 -0.51 2010 1853 154.1 +4.92 +0.47 1.120 52.6% -39 +99 +61 62.1% +0.91 10–8 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 -0.43
29 2019 1759 136.0 +1.82 +0.39 1.068 51.1% -11 +149 0 56.8% +0.43 9–13 (41%) 6–5 (55%) 93.5 +2.29 2011 1787 136.6 +2.64 -0.57 1.028 50.6% -5 +48 +103 56.6% +0.32 5–6 (45%) 8–5 (62%) 97.5 +0.59
30 2020 1649 114.7 -2.98 -3.36 0.751 43.8% +22 — — 13.6% -2.27 1–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.12 2012 1933 142.8 +3.66 +1.17 1.111 52.0% -27 -100 +6 63.6% +0.94 13–6 (68%) 8–9 (47%) 102.3 +2.25
31 2021 1713 129.5 -0.41 +1.61 1.003 50.1% -94 +132 +101 50.0% +0.10 7–9 (44%) 5–7 (42%) 95.5 +0.39 2013 1725 130.0 +1.40 +0.62 1.039 50.4% +95 +39 — 44.2% +0.10 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 94.3 +0.77
32 2022 1699 110.3 -1.74 +1.28 0.927 48.1% -77 — — 33.3% -1.17 — — — -0.20 2014 1656 109.1 -1.13 -0.85 0.922 47.9% +85 — — 30.8% -1.15 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.14
33 2023 1698 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 1713 111.5 +0.69 +0.90 1.267 54.9% -42 — — 75.0% +1.75 — — — +0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1723 125.9 -2.14 -1.19 0.879 47.2% -4 +53 — 43.8% -0.58 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 104.0 -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 1676 90.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1956 140.5 +0.50 +0.97 1.015 50.2% -21 +17 -80 52.8% +0.18 69–60 (53%) 45–45 (50%) 104.7 -0.57 — 2089 155.3 +4.43 +1.25 1.140 52.7% -11 +13 -35 61.1% +0.92 116–101 (53%) 76–78 (49%) 96.4 +0.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.