H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Anastasija Sevastova vs Patricia Maria Tig H2H: 1-1
Anastasija Sevastova and Patricia Maria Tig are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Patricia Maria Tig won the 2019 Bucharest fourth round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
LAT
Age 36
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 31
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2019* | Bucharest | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Patricia Maria Tig | 6-2 7-5 | Anastasija Sevastova | Match data |
| Jul 15, 2016* | Bucharest | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Anastasija Sevastova | 6-2 6-2 | Patricia Maria Tig | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasija Sevastova | #293 | #11 | 3,366 | 1,946 | 207 | 175 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Patricia Maria Tig | #417 | #56 | 1,284 | 1,739 | 40 | 52 | 43.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anastasija Sevastova | Patricia Maria Tig | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #79 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2010 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #45 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #123 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #108 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #232 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #114 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #113 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #56 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2016 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #34 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #225 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2017 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #16 | 1,820 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2018 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #436 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2019 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #27 | 1,759 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2020 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #54 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #400 | 1,470 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2021 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2022 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #680 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2024 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #481 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #188 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |