H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Anastasija Sevastova vs Petra Kvitova H2H: 1-2
Petra Kvitova holds a 2–1 lead over Anastasija Sevastova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Petra Kvitova leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Petra Kvitova won the 2019 Stuttgart quarterfinal 2-6 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
LAT
Age 36
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 36
Left-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2019* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | QF | Clay | Petra Kvitova | 2-6 6-2 6-3 | Anastasija Sevastova | Match data |
| Jun 16, 2011* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Petra Kvitova | 5-7 6-1 6-3 | Anastasija Sevastova | Match data |
| Jul 29, 2010* | Istanbul | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Anastasija Sevastova | 6-2 0-6 6-4 | Petra Kvitova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasija Sevastova | #293 | #11 | 3,366 | 1,946 | 207 | 175 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Petra Kvitova | #450 | #2 | 7,690 | 2,073 | 501 | 258 | 66.0% | 2 | 10 | 2 | 14 | 3 | 31 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anastasija Sevastova | Petra Kvitova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #50 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #79 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #61 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2010 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #45 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #34 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2011 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 50–11 | 82.0% | #2 | 2,058 | 1 | 7 |
| 22 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #8 | 1,961 | 1 | 9 |
| 23 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 49–22 | 69.0% | #6 | 1,966 | 1 | 11 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 41–17 | 70.7% | #4 | 1,989 | 2 | 14 |
| 25 | 2015 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #113 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #6 | 1,907 | 2 | 17 |
| 26 | 2016 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #34 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #11 | 1,966 | 2 | 19 |
| 27 | 2017 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #16 | 1,820 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #29 | 1,894 | 2 | 20 |
| 28 | 2018 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,887 | 2 | 25 |
| 29 | 2019 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #27 | 1,759 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #7 | 1,897 | 2 | 27 |
| 30 | 2020 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #54 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 20–7 | 74.1% | #8 | 1,947 | 2 | 27 |
| 31 | 2021 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #17 | 1,881 | 2 | 28 |
| 32 | 2022 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #680 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #16 | 1,920 | 2 | 29 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 29–13 | 69.0% | #14 | 1,931 | 2 | 31 |
| 34 | 2024 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #481 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #188 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 | 2025 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,773 | 2 | 31 |