H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Andrea Jaeger vs Kathy Horvath H2H: 2-2
Andrea Jaeger and Kathy Horvath are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Andrea Jaeger leads 2–1 on clay, while Kathy Horvath leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kathy Horvath won the 1984 Virginia Slims Championships fourth round 6-2 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 1984 | Virginia Slims Championships | WTA Finals | R16 | Carpet | Kathy Horvath | 6-2 7-6 | Andrea Jaeger | Match data |
| May 21, 1983* | Berlin | WTA 500 | SF | Clay | Kathy Horvath | 1-6 7-6 7-5 | Andrea Jaeger | Match data |
| Apr 24, 1982* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Andrea Jaeger | 6-4 1-6 7-6 | Kathy Horvath | Match data |
| Apr 23, 1981* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Andrea Jaeger | 1-6 6-3 7-5 | Kathy Horvath | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Jaeger | #225 | #3 | — | 2,280 | 257 | 90 | 74.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Kathy Horvath | #283 | #10 | 24 | 1,977 | 192 | 155 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Andrea Jaeger | Kathy Horvath | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1979 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 62–18 | 77.5% | — | 2,169 | 0 | 4 | 1980 | 11–7 | 61.1% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 61–18 | 77.2% | — | 2,179 | 0 | 7 | 1981 | 34–23 | 59.6% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 2 |
| 1982 | 65–20 | 76.5% | — | 2,170 | 0 | 9 | 1982 | 15–17 | 46.9% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 1983 | 50–18 | 73.5% | — | 2,091 | 0 | 10 | 1983 | 39–18 | 68.4% | — | 1,936 | 0 | 4 |
| 1984 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #42 | 2,015 | 0 | 10 | 1984 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #29 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 |
| 1985 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,932 | 0 | 10 | 1985 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,776 | 0 | 6 |
| 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,907 | 0 | 10 | 1986 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #47 | 1,740 | 0 | 6 |
| 1987 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,882 | 0 | 10 | 1987 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,714 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #85 | 1,603 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #224 | 1,530 | 0 | 7 |