H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Andrea Jaeger vs Pam Casale H2H: 4-0

Andrea Jaeger holds a 4–0 lead over Pam Casale in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Andrea Jaeger leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Andrea Jaeger won the 1984 Houston round of 16 6-1 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrea Jaeger
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main-draw meetings
Pam Casale
USA Age 62 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrea Jaeger #3 6-1 6-0 Pam Casale #32 Match data Feb 3, 1984* R16 Houston WTA 250 Carpet
Andrea Jaeger 6-3 6-2 Pam Casale Match data Jun 24, 1983* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Andrea Jaeger 6-1 6-1 Pam Casale Match data Jun 20, 1981* QF Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass
Andrea Jaeger 6-2 6-2 Pam Casale Match data Nov 14, 1980* R16 Tampa WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrea Jaeger #225 #3 — 2,266 257 90 74.1% 0 0 0 0 10 10
Pam Casale #671 #14 22 1,944 168 147 53.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrea Jaeger Pam Casale
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1979 2–2 50.0% — 1,522 0 1 — — — — — — —
15 1980 62–18 77.5% #7 2,143 0 4 — — — — — — —
16 1981 61–18 77.2% #4 2,178 0 7 1980 15–10 60.0% — 1,597 0 0
17 1982 65–20 76.5% #3 2,201 0 9 1981 30–17 63.8% — 1,810 0 0
18 1983 50–18 73.5% #3 2,103 0 10 1982 20–23 46.5% — 1,745 0 0
19 1984 9–6 60.0% #42 2,024 0 10 1983 23–20 53.5% — 1,770 0 0
20 1985 5–5 50.0% — 1,939 0 10 1984 31–17 64.6% #15 1,914 0 0
21 1986 0–1 0.0% #225 1,914 0 10 1985 24–20 54.5% #14 1,814 0 0
22 1987 3–2 60.0% — 1,899 0 10 1986 16–17 48.5% #41 1,787 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 1987 5–11 31.2% #111 1,673 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 1988 4–10 28.6% #169 1,552 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 1989 0–1 0.0% #225 1,547 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #554 1,525 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrea Jaeger Pam Casale
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1979 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1980 25 4 29 86.2% 9 4 13 69.2% 14 3 17 82.4% 14 7 21 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 8 3 11 72.7% 15 3 18 83.3% 16 5 21 76.2% 22 7 29 75.9% 1980 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1982 17 6 23 73.9% 15 4 19 78.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 22 6 28 78.6% 1981 17 6 23 73.9% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0%
18 1983 6 2 8 75.0% 23 5 28 82.1% 9 2 11 81.8% 12 9 21 57.1% 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
19 1984 4 1 5 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
20 1985 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 8 3 11 72.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 6 17 64.7%
21 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 17 7 24 70.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
22 1987 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 3 6 9 33.3% 11 5 16 68.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 65 21 86 75.6% 66 20 86 76.7% 50 14 64 78.1% 75 34 109 68.8% — 66 49 115 57.4% 55 41 96 57.3% 15 19 34 44.1% 25 35 60 41.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrea Jaeger Pam Casale
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1979 1522 114.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1980 2144 166.9 — — — — -20 -413 -289 74.1% +1.97 7–3 (70%) 5–1 (83%) 111.4 -7.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 2178 174.5 — — — — +36 -158 -155 70.3% +1.78 15–5 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 106.9 -9.68 1980 1598 118.7 — — — — +29 — — 57.4% +0.72 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +2.02
17 1982 2202 173.8 — — — — +57 -30 -141 74.7% +1.94 12–2 (86%) 7–2 (78%) 109.9 -8.09 1981 1811 140.3 — — — — -1 -153 -196 64.1% +1.03 3–6 (33%) 6–0 (100%) 101.9 +1.97
18 1983 2104 170.1 — — — — -4 +148 +47 70.7% +1.71 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 96.2 -3.88 1982 1745 140.3 — — — — -54 -4 -106 50.5% +0.01 1–8 (11%) 9–5 (64%) 95.5 -3.37
19 1984 2024 144.8 — — — — +14 — — 65.5% +1.52 0–1 0–2 — -0.45 1983 1770 144.1 — — — — -55 +93 -103 52.1% +0.47 5–3 (63%) 3–3 (50%) 102.6 -1.57
20 1985 1939 112.7 — — — — +11 — — 47.6% -0.76 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.47 1984 1914 155.3 — — — — +6 -60 -210 64.8% +1.01 3–6 (33%) 7–3 (70%) 100.3 -2.46
21 1986 1914 98.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.03 1985 1814 137.6 — — — — +80 -54 -188 53.1% +0.34 6–4 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 98.8 -1.08
22 1987 1900 104.0 — — — — — +249 — 60.0% +0.70 2–0 — — +0.16 1986 1788 137.1 — — — — -56 +52 — 46.8% -0.18 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) 103.7 -3.63
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1673 114.3 — — — — -20 — -77 41.7% -0.56 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.50
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1552 100.5 — — — — +25 +207 — 36.4% -0.79 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 92.4 +1.01
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1547 93.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.21
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1526 90.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.21
Career — 2266 172.3 — — — — +18 -41 -153 71.0% +1.72 44–18 (71%) 21–18 (54%) 107.9 -8.71 — 1944 143.5 — — — — +1 +5 -153 53.9% +0.36 32–43 (43%) 38–21 (64%) 100.1 -2.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.