H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Andrea Jaeger vs Pam Casale H2H: 4-0
Andrea Jaeger holds a 4–0 lead over Pam Casale in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Andrea Jaeger leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Andrea Jaeger won the 1984 Houston fourth round 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 1984* | Houston | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Andrea Jaeger | 6-1 6-0 | Pam Casale | Match data |
| Jun 24, 1983* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Andrea Jaeger | 6-3 6-2 | Pam Casale | Match data |
| Jun 20, 1981* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Andrea Jaeger | 6-1 6-1 | Pam Casale | Match data |
| Nov 14, 1980* | Tampa | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Andrea Jaeger | 6-2 6-2 | Pam Casale | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Jaeger | #225 | #3 | — | 2,280 | 257 | 90 | 74.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Pam Casale | #671 | #14 | 22 | 1,944 | 168 | 147 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Jaeger | Pam Casale | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1979 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1980 | 62–18 | 77.5% | — | 2,169 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | 61–18 | 77.2% | — | 2,179 | 0 | 7 | 1980 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1982 | 65–20 | 76.5% | — | 2,170 | 0 | 9 | 1981 | 30–17 | 63.8% | — | 1,811 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 50–18 | 73.5% | — | 2,091 | 0 | 10 | 1982 | 20–23 | 46.5% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #42 | 2,015 | 0 | 10 | 1983 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,932 | 0 | 10 | 1984 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #15 | 1,914 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,907 | 0 | 10 | 1985 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #14 | 1,814 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,882 | 0 | 10 | 1986 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #41 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #111 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #169 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #554 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |