H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Andrea Jaeger vs Raquel Giscafre H2H: 1-0
Andrea Jaeger holds a 1–0 lead over Raquel Giscafre in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrea Jaeger leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrea Jaeger won the 1980 Hilton Head second round 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 77
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 1980* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Andrea Jaeger | 6-1 6-0 | Raquel Giscafre | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Jaeger | #225 | #3 | — | 2,280 | 257 | 90 | 74.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Raquel Giscafre | — | — | — | 1,797 | 86 | 120 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Jaeger | Raquel Giscafre | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1979 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1980 | 62–18 | 77.5% | — | 2,169 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | 61–18 | 77.2% | — | 2,179 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 65–20 | 76.5% | — | 2,170 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 50–18 | 73.5% | — | 2,091 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #42 | 2,015 | 0 | 10 | 1968 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,932 | 0 | 10 | 1969 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,907 | 0 | 10 | 1970 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,882 | 0 | 10 | 1971 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 26–17 | 60.5% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 15–18 | 45.5% | — | 1,727 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 4 |