H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Andrea Leand vs Pam Casale H2H: 2-2
Andrea Leand and Pam Casale are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Andrea Leand leads 2–1 on carpet, while Pam Casale leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pam Casale won the 1984 Tampa fourth round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 1984* | Tampa | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Pam Casale | 6-2 6-0 | Andrea Leand | Match data |
| Jan 13, 1983* | Houston | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Andrea Leand | 6-4 7-5 | Pam Casale | Match data |
| Mar 18, 1982* | Boston | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Andrea Leand | 6-3 6-2 | Pam Casale | Match data |
| Mar 10, 1982* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R64 | Carpet | Pam Casale | 6-4 7-5 | Andrea Leand | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Leand | #857 | #27 | 13 | 1,883 | 83 | 104 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Pam Casale | #671 | #14 | 22 | 1,944 | 168 | 147 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Leand | Pam Casale | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1981 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 30–17 | 63.8% | — | 1,811 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 29–22 | 56.9% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 20–23 | 46.5% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #35 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #15 | 1,914 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #33 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #14 | 1,814 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #41 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #111 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #169 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #152 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #142 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #554 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #180 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #341 | 1,474 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #461 | 1,473 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |