H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Andrea Leand vs Pam Casale H2H: 2-2

Andrea Leand and Pam Casale are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Andrea Leand leads 2–1 on carpet, while Pam Casale leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pam Casale won the 1984 Tampa round of 16 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrea Leand
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main-draw meetings
Pam Casale
USA Age 62 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pam Casale #18 6-2 6-0 Andrea Leand #36 Match data Oct 12, 1984* R16 Tampa WTA 250 Hard
Andrea Leand 6-4 7-5 Pam Casale Match data Jan 13, 1983* R32 Houston WTA 250 Carpet
Andrea Leand 6-3 6-2 Pam Casale Match data Mar 18, 1982* R32 Boston WTA 250 Carpet
Pam Casale 6-4 7-5 Andrea Leand Match data Mar 10, 1982* R64 Dallas WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrea Leand #857 #27 13 1,881 83 104 44.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Pam Casale #671 #14 22 1,944 168 147 53.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrea Leand Pam Casale
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1980 15–10 60.0% — 1,597 0 0
17 1981 4–3 57.1% — 1,563 0 0 1981 30–17 63.8% — 1,810 0 0
18 1982 29–22 56.9% — 1,812 0 0 1982 20–23 46.5% — 1,745 0 0
19 1983 17–18 48.6% — 1,784 0 0 1983 23–20 53.5% — 1,770 0 0
20 1984 19–18 51.4% #35 1,774 0 1 1984 31–17 64.6% #15 1,914 0 0
21 1985 1–5 16.7% #33 1,681 0 1 1985 24–20 54.5% #14 1,814 0 0
22 1986 0–3 0.0% #214 1,627 0 1 1986 16–17 48.5% #41 1,787 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 1987 5–11 31.2% #111 1,673 0 0
24 1988 0–1 0.0% #296 1,607 0 1 1988 4–10 28.6% #169 1,552 0 0
25 1989 3–7 30.0% #152 1,579 0 1 1989 0–1 0.0% #225 1,547 0 0
26 1990 6–15 28.6% #142 1,516 0 1 1990 0–1 0.0% #554 1,525 0 0
27 1991 4–9 30.8% #180 1,504 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 1993 0–2 0.0% #341 1,473 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 1994 0–1 0.0% #461 1,472 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrea Leand Pam Casale
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1981 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1981 17 6 23 73.9% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0%
18 1982 10 4 14 71.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 9 8 17 52.9% 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
19 1983 7 3 10 70.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
20 1984 8 7 15 53.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1984 8 3 11 72.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 6 17 64.7%
21 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1985 17 7 24 70.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
22 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 3 6 9 33.3% 11 5 16 68.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1988 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1989 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 1990 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1991 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1993 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 37 36 73 50.7% 16 19 35 45.7% 10 18 28 35.7% 20 30 50 40.0% — 66 49 115 57.4% 55 41 96 57.3% 15 19 34 44.1% 25 35 60 41.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrea Leand Pam Casale
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1598 118.7 — — — — +29 — — 57.4% +0.72 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +2.02
17 1981 1564 118.3 — — — — +112 — — 55.6% 0.00 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.64 1981 1811 140.3 — — — — -1 -153 -196 64.1% +1.03 3–6 (33%) 6–0 (100%) 101.9 +1.97
18 1982 1813 151.1 — — — — +80 -158 -211 58.6% +0.34 6–10 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 102.1 -2.70 1982 1745 140.3 — — — — -54 -4 -106 50.5% +0.01 1–8 (11%) 9–5 (64%) 95.5 -3.37
19 1983 1785 132.5 — — — — +54 -45 -182 48.8% -0.18 7–7 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 99.5 -1.64 1983 1770 144.1 — — — — -55 +93 -103 52.1% +0.47 5–3 (63%) 3–3 (50%) 102.6 -1.57
20 1984 1775 142.9 — — — — +39 -6 -186 53.3% +0.21 6–10 (38%) 2–5 (29%) 91.3 -0.75 1984 1914 155.3 — — — — +6 -60 -210 64.8% +1.01 3–6 (33%) 7–3 (70%) 100.3 -2.46
21 1985 1681 93.6 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.92 — — — +0.61 1985 1814 137.6 — — — — +80 -54 -188 53.1% +0.34 6–4 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 98.8 -1.08
22 1986 1628 92.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.83 — 0–1 — +0.24 1986 1788 137.1 — — — — -56 +52 — 46.8% -0.18 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) 103.7 -3.63
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1673 114.3 — — — — -20 — -77 41.7% -0.56 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.50
24 1988 1608 97.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.14 1988 1552 100.5 — — — — +25 +207 — 36.4% -0.79 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 92.4 +1.01
25 1989 1579 123.9 — — — — +89 — — 34.8% -1.13 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.0 +0.47 1989 1547 93.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.21
26 1990 1517 111.0 — — — — +34 — +59 29.2% -1.79 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.82 1990 1526 90.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.21
27 1991 1505 113.3 — — — — +4 — — 34.6% -1.46 3–1 (75%) 1–0 — +0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1993 1474 94.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 1472 108.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1882 138.5 — — — — +56 -85 -134 46.4% -0.44 29–34 (46%) 15–19 (44%) 98.3 -0.85 — 1944 143.5 — — — — +1 +5 -153 53.9% +0.36 32–43 (43%) 38–21 (64%) 100.1 -2.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.