H2H data updated: 2026-08-08 02:15 UTC
Andrea Petkovic vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 1-0
Andrea Petkovic holds a 1–0 lead over Tamira Paszek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrea Petkovic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrea Petkovic won the 2011 Stuttgart third round 3-6 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 35
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Petkovic | 3-6 6-2 6-2 | Tamira Paszek | Match data | Apr 21, 2011* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Petkovic | #139 | #9 | 4,640 | 1,988 | 273 | 226 | 54.7% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
| Tamira Paszek | #446 | #299 | 230 | 1,782 | 100 | 129 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Petkovic | Tamira Paszek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2009 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #55 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2010 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #32 | 1,787 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 2–17 | 10.5% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2011 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #10 | 1,973 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2012 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,855 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2013 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #43 | 1,801 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2014 | 39–22 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2015 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #24 | 1,690 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2016 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #55 | 1,692 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #99 | 1,630 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2018 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,700 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #78 | 1,713 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,697 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,729 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #139 | 1,708 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |