H2H data updated: 2026-09-23 00:00 UTC

Andrea Petkovic vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 1-0

Andrea Petkovic holds a 1–0 lead over Tamira Paszek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrea Petkovic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrea Petkovic won the 2011 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix round of 32 3-6 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrea Petkovic
GER Age 39 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Tamira Paszek
Austria Age 35 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrea Petkovic #19 3-6 6-2 6-2 Tamira Paszek Match data Apr 21, 2011* R32 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrea Petkovic #139 #9 4,640 1,988 279 228 55.0% 0 0 1 2 4 7
Tamira Paszek #441 #366 169 1,782 100 130 43.5% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrea Petkovic Tamira Paszek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% — 1,512 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2006 6–2 75.0% — 1,599 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 2007 15–14 51.7% — 1,730 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 2008 16–18 47.1% — 1,697 0 1
18 2006 0–1 0.0% #242 1,497 0 0 2009 5–9 35.7% — 1,626 0 1
19 2007 2–4 33.3% #93 1,502 0 0 2010 9–9 50.0% — 1,642 0 2
20 2008 0–1 0.0% #378 1,500 0 0 2011 19–21 47.5% — 1,654 0 2
21 2009 11–8 57.9% #55 1,614 0 1 2012 18–21 46.2% — 1,676 0 3
22 2010 33–24 57.9% #32 1,787 0 1 2013 2–17 10.5% — 1,476 0 3
23 2011 50–17 74.6% #10 1,973 0 2 2014 1–4 20.0% — 1,469 0 3
24 2012 9–9 50.0% #125 1,855 0 2 2015 1–4 20.0% — 1,442 0 3
25 2013 19–14 57.6% #43 1,801 0 2 2016 7–10 41.2% — 1,530 0 3
26 2014 39–22 63.9% #13 1,828 0 5 — — — — — — —
27 2015 29–25 53.7% #24 1,689 0 6 — — — — — — —
28 2016 19–20 48.7% #55 1,694 0 6 — — — — — — —
29 2017 12–21 36.4% #99 1,648 0 6 — — — — — — —
30 2018 16–14 53.3% #64 1,725 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2019 16–19 45.7% #78 1,716 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 2020 0–1 0.0% #102 1,700 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 2021 16–16 50.0% #75 1,729 0 7 — — — — — — —
34 2022 8–12 40.0% #139 1,708 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrea Petkovic Tamira Paszek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 5 1 6 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 8 8 16 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 16 13 29 55.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2007 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2010 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 12 13 25 48.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
21 2009 6 6 12 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — 2012 8 14 22 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — —
22 2010 21 14 35 60.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 2013 2 9 11 18.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2011 33 10 43 76.7% 13 4 17 76.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 2012 8 8 16 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2013 12 9 21 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2016 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
26 2014 15 14 29 51.7% 19 5 24 79.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 19 18 37 51.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 13 12 25 52.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 10 12 22 45.5% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2018 13 9 22 59.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 10 11 21 47.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 5 9 14 35.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 4 6 10 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 170 142 312 54.5% 79 57 136 58.1% 24 26 50 48.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — 68 79 147 46.3% 9 29 38 23.7% 23 20 43 53.5% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 452/505 of Andrea Petkovic's and 206/229 of Tamira Paszek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Andrea Petkovic Tamira Paszek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 1/8 0.0 2.0 96.0% 47.2% 0.0% 36.4% 41.7% 45.3% 46.2%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 28/29 0.6 3.3 67.8% 58.4% 39.6% 46.1% 52.3% 52.7% 43.2%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 34/34 0.5 4.5 63.8% 56.6% 41.0% 47.4% 50.0% 50.9% 44.7%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 13/14 1.4 6.1 62.6% 58.8% 40.1% 46.8% 44.9% 52.1% 44.4%
19 2007 3/6 1.7 2.3 72.7% 59.0% 67.8% 57.1% 38.9% 60.9% 42.0% 2010 16/18 1.4 4.7 60.8% 64.2% 47.1% 48.2% 50.7% 57.5% 46.6%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 38/40 2.1 3.9 59.3% 60.4% 46.4% 46.4% 55.5% 54.5% 42.5%
21 2009 18/19 3.1 2.5 64.4% 64.3% 48.7% 51.8% 45.7% 58.4% 46.5% 2012 38/39 2.0 3.7 60.6% 59.3% 44.2% 56.2% 49.2% 53.5% 43.1%
22 2010 53/57 3.9 2.8 63.6% 62.9% 48.4% 58.6% 46.9% 57.5% 44.4% 2013 16/19 1.0 4.4 62.8% 54.4% 37.2% 49.7% 33.5% 48.1% 37.2%
23 2011 56/67 2.2 2.1 70.0% 62.7% 50.3% 56.4% 50.6% 59.0% 48.2% 2014 5/5 1.8 4.6 62.3% 60.1% 48.7% 45.5% 54.6% 55.5% 39.3%
24 2012 18/18 1.1 1.9 74.6% 57.5% 48.1% 47.6% 43.6% 55.2% 46.9% 2015 2/5 0.5 6.5 58.8% 57.8% 48.6% 41.3% 16.7% 53.9% 30.4%
25 2013 32/33 2.2 3.2 66.8% 63.7% 47.7% 55.2% 53.4% 58.3% 47.2% 2016 15/18 1.9 3.4 65.1% 56.6% 36.7% 43.8% 48.3% 49.8% 44.4%
26 2014 52/61 1.8 2.7 68.3% 61.4% 46.8% 48.8% 51.1% 56.9% 46.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 40/54 1.6 3.1 66.0% 61.4% 50.5% 51.1% 49.4% 57.6% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 38/39 1.9 3.9 64.0% 62.4% 44.9% 48.5% 47.6% 56.1% 45.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 29/33 0.5 3.3 69.4% 56.2% 42.3% 48.1% 42.0% 52.1% 46.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2018 26/30 1.4 3.8 66.1% 60.2% 47.0% 58.6% 47.7% 55.6% 44.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 35/35 2.0 3.9 63.0% 60.8% 44.2% 50.1% 44.5% 54.7% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 1/1 2.0 6.0 63.5% 54.5% 15.8% 14.3% 50.0% 40.4% 39.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 32/32 2.5 3.8 64.5% 60.6% 47.6% 49.0% 50.7% 56.0% 44.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 19/20 2.7 3.5 64.9% 61.1% 44.2% 49.2% 42.7% 55.3% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 452/507 2.1 3.1 66.5% 61.4% 47.3% 52.2% 48.0% 56.6% 45.4% — 206/231 1.4 4.1 62.7% 58.6% 42.3% 48.4% 49.2% 52.7% 43.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrea Petkovic Tamira Paszek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1512 102.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.80 1–0 1–0 — +0.21
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1599 117.1 -2.20 -1.38 0.844 45.8% +6 — — 66.7% +1.17 2–2 (50%) — — +0.29
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1730 133.4 -1.27 +0.75 0.913 47.9% -48 -179 +7 50.7% -0.37 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 104.0 -1.44
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1697 129.0 -3.26 +1.42 0.909 47.8% +12 -213 — 47.4% -0.25 8–4 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 108.1 -1.57
18 2006 1497 107.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.31 2009 1626 108.4 -2.23 +0.93 0.929 48.2% +26 -113 — 43.8% -0.53 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.05
19 2007 1503 107.1 +1.50 +0.78 1.075 51.4% +9 +35 — 35.7% -0.50 1–1 — — +0.06 2010 1643 118.8 -0.31 +0.77 1.096 52.0% +37 — — 52.4% +0.21 2–4 (33%) 2–4 (33%) 97.8 +1.13
20 2008 1501 — — — — — — — — — — — — — -0.24 2011 1654 118.4 -0.83 -1.22 0.934 48.7% -29 -208 +84 44.9% -0.32 11–4 (73%) 5–5 (50%) 105.7 +0.40
21 2009 1614 128.0 +1.55 +1.69 1.118 52.5% -54 +32 — 55.0% +0.52 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.7 +0.67 2012 1676 126.3 -1.34 -0.35 0.926 48.5% -91 -243 +189 45.0% -0.36 8–2 (80%) 5–7 (42%) 105.1 -1.21
22 2010 1788 148.0 +2.10 +1.40 1.046 50.9% -23 -95 -103 54.8% +0.44 13–10 (57%) 7–6 (54%) 106.9 -2.09 2013 1476 92.5 -4.43 -3.94 0.718 42.8% +20 -113 +289 13.9% -2.69 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.6 +1.10
23 2011 1974 155.4 +3.70 +4.59 1.176 53.6% -8 -117 -298 67.6% +1.21 14–6 (70%) 6–5 (55%) 107.7 +0.95 2014 1469 105.3 -0.61 -1.02 0.882 47.8% — — — 38.5% -1.00 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — -0.22
24 2012 1855 137.0 +0.30 +1.98 1.047 50.8% +13 — — 51.3% +0.38 3–2 (60%) 3–1 (75%) 100.8 -1.34 2015 1442 101.2 -2.43 -3.45 0.659 42.2% +34 — — 27.3% -1.27 0–1 1–1 — +0.30
25 2013 1802 138.0 +2.53 +2.59 1.133 52.5% +13 +56 — 56.6% +0.67 7–7 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 97.4 -1.81 2016 1531 112.6 -3.82 +0.69 0.885 47.2% -40 — +186 38.2% -0.88 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — -0.03
26 2014 1828 145.1 +0.94 +2.73 1.076 51.6% -34 +124 -137 59.4% +0.64 14–7 (67%) 8–7 (53%) 104.6 +0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 1690 138.2 -0.26 +3.30 1.069 51.5% +6 +218 +14 52.9% +0.33 10–9 (53%) 5–8 (38%) 95.7 +3.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 1695 134.5 0.00 +1.98 1.029 50.5% +17 +124 +6 52.3% +0.25 6–8 (43%) 2–5 (29%) 96.2 +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 1649 122.9 -3.25 +1.84 0.962 49.0% +30 +25 +34 40.8% -0.36 5–9 (36%) 3–1 (75%) 94.0 +0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2018 1725 133.1 -0.84 +0.44 1.000 50.1% +4 -68 — 52.9% +0.19 6–4 (60%) 5–6 (45%) 102.8 -0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 1716 128.9 -1.22 -0.16 0.950 49.1% -1 -46 -56 48.0% -0.12 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) 103.2 -0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 1700 98.6 -0.48 +2.36 0.665 40.0% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 1730 129.0 -0.07 +1.75 1.016 50.4% -44 +70 -86 47.8% -0.01 4–5 (44%) 3–5 (38%) 97.4 -2.21 2024 1510 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1709 124.6 -1.01 -1.99 0.884 47.5% -28 +78 -115 45.2% -0.67 1–3 (25%) 3–1 (75%) 98.7 -1.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1989 144.1 +0.65 +2.02 1.047 51.0% -6 +34 -75 54.0% +0.36 91–79 (54%) 53–55 (49%) 102.0 -0.93 — 1783 124.5 -1.95 -0.16 0.910 48.0% -16 -177 +137 44.1% -0.50 43–32 (57%) 25–24 (51%) 108.2 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.