H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC

Andrea Petkovic vs Venus Williams H2H: 2-3

Venus Williams holds a 3–2 lead over Andrea Petkovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Venus Williams leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2019 Indian Wells first round 6-4 0-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrea Petkovic
GER Age 38 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 8, 2019* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R128 Hard Venus Williams #36 6-4 0-6 6-3 Andrea Petkovic #68 Match data
Aug 2, 2014* Stanford WTA 500 QF Hard Andrea Petkovic #18 6-1 3-6 7-5 Venus Williams #25 Match data
Oct 20, 2012* Luxembourg WTA 250 SF Hard Venus Williams #41 5-7 6-4 6-4 Andrea Petkovic #182 Match data
Jun 16, 2011* Eastbourne WTA 500 R32 Grass Venus Williams #33 7-5 5-7 6-3 Andrea Petkovic #11 Match data
Jan 23, 2011* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Andrea Petkovic #33 1-0 (ret.) Venus Williams #5 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Andrea Petkovic #139 #9 4,640 1,990 273 225 54.8% 0 0 1 3 3 7
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrea Petkovic Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 2006 0–1 0.0% #242 1,497 0 0 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2007 2–4 33.3% #93 1,502 0 0 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2008 0–1 0.0% #378 1,500 0 0 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2009 11–8 57.9% #55 1,613 0 1 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2010 33–24 57.9% #32 1,796 0 1 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2011 50–17 74.6% #10 1,975 0 2 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2012 9–9 50.0% #125 1,857 0 2 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2013 19–14 57.6% #43 1,798 0 2 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2014 39–22 63.9% #13 1,826 0 5 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2015 29–25 53.7% #24 1,685 0 6 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2016 19–19 50.0% #55 1,702 0 6 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2017 9–20 31.0% #99 1,631 0 6 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2018 13–13 50.0% #64 1,700 0 6 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 2019 16–19 45.7% #78 1,712 0 6 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 2020 0–1 0.0% #102 1,697 0 6 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 2021 16–16 50.0% #75 1,730 0 7 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 2022 8–12 40.0% #139 1,707 0 7 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 — — — — — — — 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47