H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Andrea Sestini Hlavackova vs Monica Puig H2H: 1-1
Andrea Sestini Hlavackova and Monica Puig are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Monica Puig leads 1–0 on clay, while Andrea Sestini Hlavackova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrea Sestini Hlavackova won the 2014 Tianjin third round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 39
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
PUR
Age 32
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2014* | Tianjin | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Andrea Sestini Hlavackova | 7-5 6-1 | Monica Puig | Match data |
| Apr 3, 2013* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Monica Puig | 6-4 6-0 | Andrea Sestini Hlavackova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Sestini Hlavackova | #602 | #58 | 1,055 | 1,641 | 37 | 62 | 37.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Monica Puig | #1,073 | #27 | 1,570 | 1,838 | 128 | 136 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Sestini Hlavackova | Monica Puig | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #311 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #56 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #242 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #59 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #92 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #32 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #100 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #58 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2011 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #116 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #53 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2012 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #64 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #79 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2013 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #134 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #105 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2014 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #166 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2015 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #161 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1073 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2016 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #284 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2017 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #480 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |