H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Andrea Temesvari vs Kathy Horvath H2H: 1-1

Andrea Temesvari and Kathy Horvath are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrea Temesvari leads 1–0 on clay, while Kathy Horvath leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kathy Horvath won the 1986 Key Biscayne round of 16 0-6 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrea Temesvari
HUN Age 60 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Kathy Horvath
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kathy Horvath #51 0-6 6-2 6-2 Andrea Temesvari #17 Match data Jan 31, 1986* R16 Key Biscayne WTA 250 Hard
Andrea Temesvari 6-3 6-1 Kathy Horvath Match data Aug 5, 1983* QF Indianapolis WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrea Temesvari #932 #7 109 2,021 185 179 50.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Kathy Horvath #283 #10 24 1,975 187 155 54.7% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrea Temesvari Kathy Horvath
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1979 0–2 0.0% — 1,496 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1980 6–7 46.2% — 1,563 0 0
15 1981 11–6 64.7% — 1,624 0 1 1981 34–23 59.6% — 1,858 0 2
16 1982 18–14 56.2% — 1,770 0 1 1982 15–17 46.9% — 1,775 0 2
17 1983 42–15 73.7% — 1,989 0 4 1983 39–18 68.4% — 1,930 0 4
18 1984 24–16 60.0% #14 1,889 0 4 1984 25–19 56.8% #29 1,799 0 4
19 1985 18–12 60.0% #16 1,848 0 5 1985 23–16 59.0% #34 1,775 0 6
20 1986 11–12 47.8% #43 1,801 0 5 1986 16–15 51.6% #47 1,739 0 6
21 1987 1–2 33.3% #193 1,775 0 5 1987 18–15 54.5% #37 1,714 0 7
22 — — — — — — — 1988 9–15 37.5% #85 1,602 0 7
23 1989 18–15 54.5% #43 1,750 0 5 1989 2–8 20.0% #224 1,529 0 7
24 1990 8–19 29.6% #117 1,611 0 5 — — — — — — —
25 1991 6–14 30.0% #159 1,542 0 5 — — — — — — —
26 1992 11–12 47.8% #70 1,607 0 5 — — — — — — —
27 1993 5–20 20.0% #153 1,475 0 5 — — — — — — —
28 1994 2–7 22.2% #133 1,476 0 5 — — — — — — —
29 1995 6–8 42.9% #90 1,485 0 5 — — — — — — —
30 1996 4–6 40.0% #181 1,532 0 5 — — — — — — —
31 1997 0–1 0.0% #940 1,528 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrea Temesvari Kathy Horvath
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
15 1981 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1981 7 4 11 63.6% 15 8 23 65.2% — — — — 12 11 23 52.2%
16 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 7 9 22.2%
17 1983 2 2 4 50.0% 29 5 34 85.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 9 7 16 56.3% 1983 9 4 13 69.2% 21 11 32 65.6% — — — — 9 3 12 75.0%
18 1984 5 3 8 62.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 1984 0 5 5 0.0% 21 9 30 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
19 1985 7 3 10 70.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1985 6 5 11 54.5% 17 7 24 70.8% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0%
20 1986 6 5 11 54.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1986 8 7 15 53.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
21 1987 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 2 5 7 28.6% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 1989 9 7 16 56.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1989 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 1990 1 7 8 12.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1992 4 4 8 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 3 9 12 25.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 44 57 101 43.6% 89 62 151 58.9% 15 15 30 50.0% 26 43 69 37.7% — 45 50 95 47.4% 111 67 178 62.4% 3 6 9 33.3% 28 32 60 46.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrea Temesvari Kathy Horvath
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1497 113.4 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 0–1 — -0.25
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1563 110.2 — — — — +45 -63 — 43.3% -0.37 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 102.0 -0.09
15 1981 1624 130.8 — — — — — — — 60.5% +0.97 3–1 (75%) 0–2 — +0.26 1981 1859 146.5 — — — — -40 -79 — 56.3% +0.44 11–7 (61%) 7–5 (58%) 108.4 +0.14
16 1982 1771 146.3 — — — — -152 -30 -161 59.2% +0.69 3–6 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -2.86 1982 1775 143.3 — — — — -40 +62 — 52.9% +0.46 1–7 (13%) 2–3 (40%) 92.6 -4.36
17 1983 1989 163.0 — — — — -215 +103 -366 75.4% +2.16 4–4 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.7 +1.64 1983 1931 149.2 — — — — -65 +55 — 63.7% +0.74 9–3 (75%) 11–6 (65%) 109.3 +1.14
18 1984 1889 136.5 — — — — -78 +109 -173 61.2% +0.68 5–4 (56%) 6–2 (75%) 105.3 +3.39 1984 1799 146.8 — — — — -83 +206 — 56.1% +0.43 5–5 (50%) 3–7 (30%) 94.7 +0.34
19 1985 1849 136.4 — — — — -49 +129 — 61.5% +0.86 3–4 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 95.7 +1.35 1985 1776 138.0 — — — — -112 +220 — 55.8% +0.24 6–2 (75%) 5–2 (71%) 104.1 -0.67
20 1986 1802 139.4 — — — — -40 +157 — 55.1% +0.29 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 94.1 -1.37 1986 1740 130.3 — — — — -73 +184 -140 48.6% -0.18 7–3 (70%) 3–3 (50%) 104.3 -1.58
21 1987 1776 105.3 — — — — -40 — — 42.9% -1.29 0–1 — — -0.17 1987 1714 125.9 — — — — -43 +149 — 54.1% +0.18 6–4 (60%) 3–2 (60%) 101.2 +3.16
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1603 116.3 — — — — +7 +113 — 41.5% -0.64 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 94.3 +0.35
23 1989 1751 135.2 — — — — -31 +153 — 50.0% -0.01 7–3 (70%) 5–6 (45%) 102.1 -0.26 1989 1530 101.0 — — — — +17 — — 33.3% -1.38 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 95.4 +0.29
24 1990 1612 121.4 — — — — +8 +190 — 34.5% -1.48 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 98.1 +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1991 1542 110.6 — — — — +7 +224 +66 36.4% -1.34 0–4 (0%) 1–4 (20%) 92.0 +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1992 1607 122.1 — — — — -5 +82 +65 41.5% -0.70 7–2 (78%) 3–3 (50%) 106.9 +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 1476 111.1 — — — — +31 +134 — 28.8% -1.37 3–5 (38%) 2–4 (33%) 97.7 +0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 1477 113.1 — — — — +1 +154 — 27.8% -1.83 1–1 — — -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 1486 104.6 — — — — -22 +124 — 43.8% -0.38 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.7 +1.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 1532 128.1 — — — — — +113 — 45.5% -0.36 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 1529 108.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2021 143.3 — — — — -57 +117 -110 52.6% +0.18 42–48 (47%) 33–38 (46%) 97.5 +1.14 — 1976 144.0 — — — — -49 +106 -140 53.7% +0.21 49–40 (55%) 39–36 (52%) 103.2 -0.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.