H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Andrea Temesvari vs Kathy Horvath H2H: 1-1
Andrea Temesvari and Kathy Horvath are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrea Temesvari leads 1–0 on clay, while Kathy Horvath leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kathy Horvath won the 1986 Key Biscayne fourth round 0-6 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 60
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 1986* | Key Biscayne | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Kathy Horvath | 0-6 6-2 6-2 | Andrea Temesvari | Match data |
| Aug 5, 1983* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Andrea Temesvari | 6-3 6-1 | Kathy Horvath | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Temesvari | #932 | #7 | 109 | 2,021 | 185 | 178 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Kathy Horvath | #283 | #10 | 24 | 1,977 | 192 | 155 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Andrea Temesvari | Kathy Horvath | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1981 | 11–6 | 64.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 18–14 | 56.2% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 11–7 | 61.1% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 42–15 | 73.7% | — | 1,988 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 34–23 | 59.6% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 2 |
| 1984 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #14 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 15–17 | 46.9% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 1985 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,847 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 39–18 | 68.4% | — | 1,936 | 0 | 4 |
| 1986 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #29 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 |
| 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #193 | 1,762 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,776 | 0 | 6 |
| 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #43 | 1,752 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #47 | 1,740 | 0 | 6 |
| 1990 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #117 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,714 | 0 | 7 |
| 1991 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #159 | 1,542 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #85 | 1,603 | 0 | 7 |
| 1992 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,616 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #224 | 1,530 | 0 | 7 |
| 1993 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #153 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #133 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,487 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #181 | 1,537 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #940 | 1,533 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |