H2H data updated: 2026-08-15 02:40 UTC

Angelique Kerber vs Kimiko Date H2H: 1-0

Angelique Kerber holds a 1–0 lead over Kimiko Date in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Angelique Kerber leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Angelique Kerber won the 2011 Hobart round of 32 7-5 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Angelique Kerber
GER Age 38 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Angelique Kerber #46 7-5 7-6(3) Kimiko Date #52 Match data Jan 13, 2011* R32 Hobart WTA 250 Hard

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Angelique Kerber #205 #1 9,080 2,072 472 273 63.4% 3 0 0 10 1 14
Kimiko Date #1,191 #4 1,280 2,091 245 190 56.3% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Angelique Kerber Kimiko Date
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2006 1–1 50.0% #172 1,516 0 0 1989 6–5 54.5% #119 1,563 0 0
19 2007 6–10 37.5% #88 1,549 0 0 1990 10–7 58.8% #79 1,665 0 0
20 2008 7–14 33.3% #100 1,503 0 0 1991 12–11 52.2% #32 1,725 0 0
21 2009 3–6 33.3% #117 1,512 0 0 1992 27–14 65.9% #21 1,853 0 1
22 2010 23–19 54.8% #46 1,668 0 0 1993 25–11 69.4% #13 1,948 0 2
23 2011 17–20 45.9% #32 1,673 0 0 1994 32–12 72.7% #9 1,985 0 4
24 2012 60–21 74.1% #5 1,978 0 2 1995 39–12 76.5% #4 2,028 0 5
25 2013 45–22 67.2% #9 1,944 0 3 1996 34–14 70.8% #8 2,076 0 7
26 2014 43–22 66.2% #10 1,895 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 2015 51–22 69.9% #10 1,925 0 7 — — — — — — —
28 2016 59–17 77.6% #1 2,050 2 10 — — — — — — —
29 2017 28–23 54.9% #21 1,773 2 10 — — — — — — —
30 2018 43–16 72.9% #2 1,929 3 12 — — — — — — —
31 2019 28–19 59.6% #20 1,805 3 12 — — — — — — —
32 2020 7–6 53.8% #25 1,768 3 12 — — — — — — —
33 2021 29–15 65.9% #16 1,935 3 13 — — — — — — —
34 2022 13–9 59.1% #104 1,880 3 14 — — — — — — —
36 2024 9–11 45.0% #205 1,830 3 14 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #189 2,048 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% #69 1,845 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% #51 1,823 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% #87 1,570 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% #99 1,456 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% #75 1,576 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% #90 1,598 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% #182 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% #1191 1,564 0 8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Angelique Kerber Kimiko Date
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2006 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
19 2007 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1990 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2008 5 7 12 41.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1991 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2009 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1992 15 6 21 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
22 2010 9 8 17 52.9% 10 8 18 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1993 18 6 24 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7%
23 2011 16 12 28 57.1% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 26 5 31 83.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 2012 31 14 45 68.9% 12 4 16 75.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 1995 16 6 22 72.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 1 7 85.7%
25 2013 35 17 52 67.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1996 25 8 33 75.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2014 29 14 43 67.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 28 17 45 62.2% 16 4 20 80.0% 7 1 8 87.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 43 10 53 81.1% 8 5 13 61.5% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 21 17 38 55.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2018 28 12 40 70.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 7 1 8 87.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 18 13 31 58.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 7 4 11 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 14 9 23 60.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 2 4 6 33.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 17 15 32 53.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 4 16 20 20.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 2 11 13 15.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 294 173 467 63.0% 90 65 155 58.1% 82 33 115 71.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — 170 127 297 57.2% 24 27 51 47.1% 31 24 55 56.4% 20 12 32 62.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Angelique Kerber Kimiko Date
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule
18 2006 1516 107.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 -0.05 1989 1563 118.2 — — — — -8 — +54 48.0% +0.24 3–0 (100%) 1–1 +1.06
19 2007 1549 124.6 +0.02 -1.44 0.935 48.4% -29 — +104 34.4% -0.87 1–1 0–1 -0.47 1990 1665 128.3 — — — — -15 — — 57.1% +0.40 1–0 3–2 (60%) +0.20
20 2008 1504 112.7 -2.69 +0.78 0.944 48.5% +37 -41 +104 37.8% -0.69 2–3 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 0.00 1991 1725 132.7 — — — — -21 — -80 52.7% +0.15 4–5 (44%) 3–1 (75%) -0.17
21 2009 1513 113.2 -1.90 +0.77 0.918 48.2% +14 -33 — 38.1% -0.71 1–2 (33%) 1–0 -0.17 1992 1854 155.6 — — — — +53 -237 -208 60.9% +0.92 8–2 (80%) 1–5 (17%) -0.85
22 2010 1668 127.6 +0.01 +1.81 1.048 51.1% -38 -116 +2 55.8% +0.35 6–7 (46%) 6–0 (100%) +0.91 1993 1948 158.1 — — — — +75 -344 — 62.8% +1.00 7–1 (88%) 4–3 (57%) -0.50
23 2011 1674 134.3 +0.19 +2.26 1.075 51.7% +34 -185 — 51.7% +0.20 3–12 (20%) 3–3 (50%) +0.31 1994 1985 161.2 — — — — +87 -347 -333 67.0% +1.34 10–7 (59%) 3–1 (75%) -1.12
24 2012 1979 159.7 +4.77 +3.63 1.156 53.1% -44 -217 -94 65.7% +1.17 20–3 (87%) 8–8 (50%) -5.51 1995 2029 160.2 — — — — +41 -191 -290 71.6% +1.43 11–5 (69%) 6–1 (86%) -1.54
25 2013 1944 154.5 +3.64 +3.42 1.160 53.2% +8 -94 -90 64.3% +1.08 11–11 (50%) 9–9 (50%) +3.20 1996 2077 165.2 — — — — +20 -248 -187 65.8% +1.32 11–9 (55%) 1–5 (17%) -2.14
26 2014 1896 152.4 +1.64 +4.02 1.107 52.2% +5 -108 +49 62.8% +0.86 13–9 (59%) 12–6 (67%) +0.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 1925 151.8 +2.11 +5.08 1.156 52.9% -41 -28 +57 66.1% +1.10 15–11 (58%) 7–7 (50%) -0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 2050 161.0 +4.61 +4.69 1.196 53.6% +9 -141 -20 72.1% +1.45 16–6 (73%) 10–2 (83%) -3.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 1773 141.4 +2.15 +0.75 1.052 50.7% +41 +64 +267 55.2% +0.35 8–8 (50%) 7–4 (64%) +1.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2018 1930 162.9 +3.35 +5.52 1.194 53.8% -25 -12 +180 69.2% +1.23 11–8 (58%) 9–4 (69%) -1.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 1806 144.8 +1.55 +3.03 1.110 52.1% -6 +92 +297 60.0% +0.66 6–11 (35%) 7–4 (64%) +0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 1768 128.0 -0.58 -0.32 0.999 50.1% +44 — — 53.6% +0.36 1–1 2–4 (33%) +1.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 1936 147.2 +1.85 +3.36 1.088 51.7% -70 -88 +356 58.2% +0.72 11–3 (79%) 3–4 (43%) -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1880 133.0 +1.28 +1.92 1.061 51.3% -34 +12 +360 54.9% +0.43 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) +0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 1831 134.0 -0.86 +0.60 0.931 48.8% -2 +61 +283 46.7% -0.20 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) -0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 2048 101.3 +0.44 -0.26 0.663 40.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — -0.03
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1845 123.3 -0.97 +0.28 0.931 48.6% +24 — — 44.4% -0.38 3–8 (27%) 2–3 (40%) -0.94
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1823 145.4 -0.25 +1.83 0.998 49.9% +18 -46 — 51.8% -0.11 11–8 (58%) 9–2 (82%) -3.51
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1571 117.6 -2.22 +0.23 0.876 46.9% +27 +117 +226 27.3% -1.21 0–4 (0%) 3–10 (23%) -2.53
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1457 113.8 -2.85 -1.69 0.875 47.1% +33 — — 20.0% -1.63 0–3 (0%) 0–1 +0.01
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1576 135.2 -1.65 +2.04 0.997 50.0% +7 — +183 46.4% +0.04 2–4 (33%) 0–7 (0%) -0.48
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1598 125.3 -1.57 -0.21 0.942 48.7% -18 — +176 50.8% -0.15 5–8 (38%) 5–4 (56%) +0.39
44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1574 112.8 -2.60 -0.62 0.817 46.3% -2 — — 35.0% -0.65 1–1 1–2 (33%) +0.17
46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1565 90.3 +0.34 -0.32 0.246 20.3% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — -0.16
Career — 2072 154.8 +2.18 +3.14 1.105 52.1% -7 -72 +127 60.6% +0.76 132–104 (56%) 91–64 (59%) -0.44 — 2091 154.4 -1.51 +0.62 0.928 48.3% +30 -185 -61 55.2% +0.45 77–65 (54%) 42–48 (47%) -2.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.