H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Angelique Kerber vs Nathalie Dechy H2H: 0-1
Nathalie Dechy holds a 1–0 lead over Angelique Kerber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nathalie Dechy leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nathalie Dechy won the 2007 Portoroz third round 6-3 3-6 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 38
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 47
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2007* | Portoroz | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Nathalie Dechy | 6-3 3-6 7-6(5) | Angelique Kerber | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angelique Kerber | #205 | #1 | 9,080 | 2,045 | 461 | 270 | 63.1% | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 14 |
| Nathalie Dechy | #88 | #11 | 1,773 | 1,917 | 291 | 270 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Angelique Kerber | Nathalie Dechy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #73 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #88 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #50 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #25 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #26 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #46 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #43 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #32 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #20 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 57–20 | 74.0% | #5 | 1,983 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2013 | 45–22 | 67.2% | #9 | 1,947 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #21 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,895 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 40–26 | 60.6% | #12 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2015 | 51–22 | 69.9% | #10 | 1,917 | 0 | 7 | 2006 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #48 | 1,649 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2016 | 54–16 | 77.1% | #1 | 2,024 | 2 | 10 | 2007 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #68 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2017 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #21 | 1,767 | 2 | 10 | 2008 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #69 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2018 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #2 | 1,924 | 3 | 12 | 2009 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #88 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2019 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #20 | 1,800 | 3 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #25 | 1,764 | 3 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #16 | 1,933 | 3 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #104 | 1,878 | 3 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #205 | 1,788 | 3 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |