H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Angelique Kerber vs Petra Cetkovska H2H: 1-1
Angelique Kerber and Petra Cetkovska are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Petra Cetkovska leads 1–0 on clay, while Angelique Kerber leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Petra Cetkovska won the 2014 Rome third round 4-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 38
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 41
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2014* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Petra Cetkovska | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Angelique Kerber | Match data |
| Feb 15, 2014* | Doha | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Angelique Kerber | 6-1 6-0 | Petra Cetkovska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angelique Kerber | #205 | #1 | 9,080 | 2,045 | 461 | 270 | 63.1% | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 14 |
| Petra Cetkovska | #954 | #25 | 1,955 | 1,761 | 73 | 81 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Angelique Kerber | Petra Cetkovska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2007 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #88 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2008 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2009 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #46 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #32 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #83 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 57–20 | 74.0% | #5 | 1,983 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #149 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 45–22 | 67.2% | #9 | 1,947 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #143 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,895 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 51–22 | 69.9% | #10 | 1,917 | 0 | 7 | 2012 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #55 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 54–16 | 77.1% | #1 | 2,024 | 2 | 10 | 2013 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2017 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #21 | 1,767 | 2 | 10 | 2014 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #58 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2018 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #2 | 1,924 | 3 | 12 | 2015 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2019 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #20 | 1,800 | 3 | 12 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #591 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #25 | 1,764 | 3 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #16 | 1,933 | 3 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #104 | 1,878 | 3 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #205 | 1,788 | 3 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |