H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Angelique Kerber vs Shuai Peng H2H: 2-0

Angelique Kerber holds a 2–0 lead over Shuai Peng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Angelique Kerber leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Angelique Kerber won the 2016 Birmingham third round 7-6(3) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Angelique Kerber
GER Age 38 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Shuai Peng
CHN Age 40 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 16, 2016* Birmingham WTA 250 R32 Grass Angelique Kerber #4 7-6(3) 6-3 Shuai Peng #266 Match data
Mar 19, 2014* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Angelique Kerber #9 6-3 1-6 7-6(5) Shuai Peng #44 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Angelique Kerber #205 #1 9,080 2,045 461 270 63.1% 3 0 0 10 1 14
Shuai Peng #820 #14 2,825 1,890 300 258 53.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Angelique Kerber Shuai Peng
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% #518 1,493 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #366 1,484 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2003 0–2 0.0% #221 1,455 0 0
18 2006 1–1 50.0% #172 1,515 0 0 2004 5–4 55.6% #80 1,516 0 0
19 2007 6–10 37.5% #88 1,548 0 0 2005 20–16 55.6% #36 1,678 0 0
20 2008 7–14 33.3% #100 1,504 0 0 2006 18–17 51.4% #55 1,727 0 0
21 2009 3–6 33.3% #117 1,512 0 0 2007 19–17 52.8% #45 1,737 0 0
22 2010 23–19 54.8% #46 1,668 0 0 2008 24–22 52.2% #40 1,706 0 0
23 2011 17–20 45.9% #32 1,675 0 0 2009 23–22 51.1% #46 1,770 0 0
24 2012 57–20 74.0% #5 1,983 0 2 2010 15–13 53.6% #72 1,742 0 0
25 2013 45–22 67.2% #9 1,947 0 3 2011 48–23 67.6% #17 1,817 0 0
26 2014 43–22 66.2% #9 1,895 0 3 2012 21–22 48.8% #40 1,699 0 0
27 2015 51–22 69.9% #10 1,917 0 7 2013 18–18 50.0% #42 1,657 0 0
28 2016 54–16 77.1% #1 2,024 2 10 2014 28–22 56.0% #21 1,743 0 0
29 2017 28–23 54.9% #21 1,767 2 10 2015 6–7 46.2% #137 1,698 0 0
30 2018 43–16 72.9% #2 1,924 3 12 2016 8–10 44.4% #84 1,711 0 1
31 2019 28–19 59.6% #20 1,800 3 12 2017 37–21 63.8% #27 1,815 0 2
32 2020 7–6 53.8% #25 1,764 3 12 2018 1–8 11.1% #125 1,741 0 2
33 2021 29–15 65.9% #16 1,933 3 13 2019 7–9 43.8% #109 1,679 0 2
34 2022 13–9 59.1% #104 1,878 3 14 2020 2–3 40.0% #117 1,636 0 2
36 2024 6–10 37.5% #205 1,788 3 14 — — — — — — —