H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:17 UTC
Anhelina Kalinina vs Camila Osorio H2H: 1-1
Anhelina Kalinina and Camila Osorio are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Camila Osorio leads 1–0 on clay, while Anhelina Kalinina leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Camila Osorio won the 2024 Roland Garros first round 3-6 7-6(2) 4-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 29
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
COL
Age 24
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2026 | Rome | WTA 1000 | Q2 | Clay | Anhelina Kalinina | 6-3 7-5 | Camila Osorio | Match data |
| May 28, 2024* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Camila Osorio | 3-6 7-6(2) 4-1 | Anhelina Kalinina | Match data |
| Mar 1, 2024* | Austin | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Anhelina Kalinina | 6-1 6-2 | Camila Osorio | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anhelina Kalinina | #59 | #25 | 1,677 | 1,901 | 96 | 106 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Camila Osorio | #53 | #33 | 1,354 | 1,825 | 100 | 89 | 52.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anhelina Kalinina | Camila Osorio | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #477 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #207 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 18–11 | 62.1% | #55 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #107 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #78 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #161 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #163 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #77 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2021 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #52 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #53 | 1,793 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2022 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #39 | 1,827 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2023 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #28 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2024 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #55 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2025 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #127 | 1,758 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2026 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |