H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Aniko Kapros vs Jana Nejedly H2H: 1-0
Aniko Kapros holds a 1–0 lead over Jana Nejedly in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Aniko Kapros leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Aniko Kapros won the 2001 Oklahoma City fourth round 4-6 6-1 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 42
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 52
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2001* | Oklahoma City | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Aniko Kapros | 4-6 6-1 7-6(5) | Jana Nejedly | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aniko Kapros | #1,173 | #45 | 722 | 1,691 | 35 | 40 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jana Nejedly | #914 | #64 | 488 | 1,626 | 49 | 104 | 32.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Aniko Kapros | Jana Nejedly | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #578 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2001 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #110 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2002 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #107 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #92 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #328 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #85 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #245 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #82 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #130 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #137 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #250 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #75 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #88 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #69 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #96 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #233 | 1,424 | 0 | 0 |