H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Aniko Kapros vs Stephanie Foretz Gacon H2H: 1-0
Aniko Kapros holds a 1–0 lead over Stephanie Foretz Gacon in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Aniko Kapros leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Aniko Kapros won the 2001 Budapest fourth round 1-6 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 42
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 45
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2001* | Budapest | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Aniko Kapros | 1-6 6-2 6-3 | Stephanie Foretz Gacon | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aniko Kapros | #1,173 | #45 | 722 | 1,691 | 35 | 40 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Stephanie Foretz Gacon | — | — | — | 1,647 | 61 | 115 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Aniko Kapros | Stephanie Foretz Gacon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #578 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2001 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #110 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2002 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #107 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #92 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #85 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #245 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 11–12 | 47.8% | — | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 3–10 | 23.1% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #250 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,421 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,402 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,406 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |