H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Anke Huber vs Amanda Coetzer H2H: 4-3

Anke Huber holds a 4–3 lead over Amanda Coetzer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Anke Huber leads 4–2 on hard courts, while Amanda Coetzer leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Amanda Coetzer won the 2000 New Haven quarterfinal 7-6(3) 6-1.

GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
4 3
7 main draw meetings
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 158 cm / 5'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 26, 2000* New Haven WTA 500 QF Hard Amanda Coetzer #14 7-6(3) 6-1 Anke Huber #10 Match data
May 11, 2000* Berlin WTA 1000 QF Clay Amanda Coetzer #16 6-4 6-4 Anke Huber #12 Match data
Aug 21, 1998* Canadian Open WTA 1000 R16 Hard Anke Huber #21 7-5 7-6 Amanda Coetzer #11 Match data
Jan 28, 1998* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Anke Huber #13 2-6 6-4 7-5 Amanda Coetzer #6 Match data
Aug 16, 1997* Canadian Open WTA 1000 QF Hard Anke Huber #8 2-6 6-1 6-4 Amanda Coetzer #6 Match data
Aug 28, 1996* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Amanda Coetzer #17 6-1 2-6 6-2 Anke Huber #5 Match data
Jan 28, 1996* Australian Open Grand Slam SF Hard Anke Huber #9 4-6 6-4 6-2 Amanda Coetzer #18 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anke Huber #18 #4 2,721 2,130 393 203 65.9% 0 1 0 1 10 12
Amanda Coetzer #289 #3 3,380 2,051 491 307 61.5% 0 1 0 1 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anke Huber Amanda Coetzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–1 50.0% #199 1,517 0 0
15 1990 14–9 60.9% #37 1,708 0 1
16 1991 30–13 69.8% #14 1,959 0 2 1988 3–2 60.0% #152 1,536 0 0
17 1992 28–15 65.1% #11 1,964 0 2 1989 16–13 55.2% #63 1,675 0 0
18 1993 41–15 73.2% #10 2,056 0 3 1990 16–19 45.7% #76 1,662 0 0
19 1994 38–16 70.4% #12 2,027 0 6 1991 15–19 44.1% #68 1,686 0 0
20 1995 41–15 73.2% #10 2,091 0 7 1992 35–15 70.0% #17 1,857 0 0
21 1996 45–15 75.0% #7 2,055 0 10 1993 42–18 70.0% #15 1,991 0 2
22 1997 34–24 58.6% #13 1,954 0 10 1994 38–19 66.7% #18 1,885 0 3
23 1998 25–18 58.1% #21 1,898 0 10 1995 31–22 58.5% #19 1,910 0 3
24 1999 32–26 55.2% #16 1,886 0 10 1996 31–20 60.8% #14 1,863 0 3
25 2000 29–16 64.4% #19 1,898 0 12 1997 60–25 70.6% #4 2,013 0 5
26 2001 35–20 63.6% #18 1,834 0 12 1998 32–23 58.2% #17 1,887 0 6
27 1999 37–25 59.7% #11 1,815 0 6
28 2000 44–22 66.7% #12 1,892 0 7
29 2001 32–21 60.4% #19 1,786 0 8
30 2002 30–22 57.7% #21 1,795 0 8
31 2003 27–19 58.7% #25 1,738 0 9
32 2004 2–3 40.0% #286 1,718 0 9