H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anke Huber vs Ann Grossman H2H: 4-0
Anke Huber holds a 4–0 lead over Ann Grossman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Anke Huber leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anke Huber won the 1997 Auckland fourth round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 51
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 1997* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Anke Huber | 6-4 6-2 | Ann Grossman | Match data |
| May 5, 1995* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Anke Huber | 6-3 6-1 | Ann Grossman | Match data |
| May 14, 1993* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Anke Huber | 5-7 6-1 6-3 | Ann Grossman | Match data |
| Jan 14, 1993* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Anke Huber | 6-4 4-6 7-6 | Ann Grossman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anke Huber | #18 | #4 | 2,721 | 2,130 | 393 | 203 | 65.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 12 |
| Ann Grossman | #343 | #29 | 384 | 1,888 | 187 | 185 | 50.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anke Huber | Ann Grossman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1990 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #37 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1991 | 30–13 | 69.8% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1992 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #11 | 1,964 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,056 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #54 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #12 | 2,027 | 0 | 6 | 1990 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #50 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,091 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #89 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,055 | 0 | 10 | 1992 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #13 | 1,954 | 0 | 10 | 1993 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #35 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 | 1994 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #37 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #16 | 1,886 | 0 | 10 | 1995 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #88 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #19 | 1,898 | 0 | 12 | 1996 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #72 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #18 | 1,834 | 0 | 12 | 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #75 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #283 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |