H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Anke Huber vs Florencia Labat H2H: 4-0

Anke Huber holds a 4–0 lead over Florencia Labat in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Anke Huber leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anke Huber won the 1998 Canadian Open third round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anke Huber
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Florencia Labat
ARG Age 55 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 20, 1998* Canadian Open WTA 1000 R32 Hard Anke Huber #21 6-2 6-4 Florencia Labat #60 Match data
Aug 14, 1997* Canadian Open WTA 1000 R32 Hard Anke Huber #8 6-2 6-1 Florencia Labat #39 Match data
Aug 16, 1996* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 R16 Hard Anke Huber #5 6-1 6-7 Florencia Labat #50 Match data
Jun 27, 1993* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Anke Huber #10 6-4 6-3 Florencia Labat #41 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anke Huber #18 #4 2,721 2,130 393 203 65.9% 0 1 0 1 10 12
Florencia Labat #106 #26 733 1,875 190 181 51.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anke Huber Florencia Labat
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–1 50.0% #199 1,517 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 14–9 60.9% #37 1,708 0 1 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,482 0 0
16 1991 30–13 69.8% #14 1,959 0 2 — — — — — — —
17 1992 28–15 65.1% #11 1,964 0 2 — — — — — — —
18 1993 41–15 73.2% #10 2,056 0 3 1989 8–8 50.0% #77 1,546 0 0
19 1994 38–16 70.4% #12 2,027 0 6 1990 12–18 40.0% #100 1,572 0 0
20 1995 41–15 73.2% #10 2,091 0 7 1991 19–17 52.8% #60 1,671 0 0
21 1996 45–15 75.0% #7 2,055 0 10 1992 18–16 52.9% #52 1,736 0 0
22 1997 34–24 58.6% #13 1,954 0 10 1993 21–16 56.8% #51 1,764 0 0
23 1998 25–18 58.1% #21 1,898 0 10 1994 27–15 64.3% #38 1,793 0 0
24 1999 32–26 55.2% #16 1,886 0 10 1995 16–13 55.2% #55 1,783 0 0
25 2000 29–16 64.4% #19 1,898 0 12 1996 24–17 58.5% #42 1,767 0 0
26 2001 35–20 63.6% #18 1,834 0 12 1997 21–25 45.7% #39 1,674 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 1998 13–20 39.4% #64 1,655 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 1999 3–6 33.3% #117 1,620 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2000 8–9 47.1% #106 1,624 0 0