H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Anke Huber vs Jana Nejedly H2H: 1-0

Anke Huber holds a 1–0 lead over Jana Nejedly in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anke Huber leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anke Huber won the 1995 Manhattan Beach round of 32 6-7 7-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anke Huber
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Jana Nejedly
CAN Age 52 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anke Huber #10 6-7 7-6 7-5 Jana Nejedly #87 Match data Aug 10, 1995* R32 Manhattan Beach Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anke Huber #18 #4 2,721 2,122 398 205 66.0% 0 1 0 4 7 12
Jana Nejedly #914 #64 488 1,625 49 105 31.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anke Huber Jana Nejedly
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–1 50.0% #199 1,518 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 14–9 60.9% #37 1,708 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1991 30–13 69.8% #14 1,959 0 2 — — — — — — —
17 1992 31–16 66.0% #11 1,973 0 2 — — — — — — —
18 1993 41–15 73.2% #10 2,058 0 3 — — — — — — —
19 1994 38–16 70.4% #12 2,030 0 6 1993 0–3 0.0% #328 1,462 0 0
20 1995 41–15 73.2% #10 2,082 0 7 1994 3–9 25.0% #139 1,467 0 0
21 1996 47–16 74.6% #6 2,031 0 10 1995 11–12 47.8% #82 1,580 0 0
22 1997 34–24 58.6% #13 1,969 0 10 1996 3–9 25.0% #130 1,552 0 0
23 1998 25–18 58.1% #21 1,900 0 10 1997 0–2 0.0% #137 1,541 0 0
24 1999 32–26 55.2% #16 1,872 0 10 1998 4–9 30.8% #75 1,556 0 0
25 2000 29–16 64.4% #19 1,895 0 12 1999 5–13 27.8% #88 1,496 0 0
26 2001 35–20 63.6% #18 1,834 0 12 2000 12–20 37.5% #69 1,528 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2001 8–17 32.0% #96 1,520 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2002 3–11 21.4% #233 1,423 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anke Huber Jana Nejedly
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1989 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1990 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1991 15 6 21 71.4% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1992 10 5 15 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 5 15 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1993 16 7 23 69.6% 16 4 20 80.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1994 11 6 17 64.7% 13 4 17 76.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 1993 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1995 19 8 27 70.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 1994 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 2 4 6 33.3%
21 1996 21 8 29 72.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 1 8 87.5% 11 3 14 78.6% 1995 9 9 18 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1997 17 10 27 63.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 1996 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1998 17 10 27 63.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 8 7 15 53.3% 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1999 19 13 32 59.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 8 16 50.0% 1998 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2000 7 10 17 41.2% 18 4 22 81.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2001 16 9 25 64.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 3 1 4 75.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 2000 7 10 17 41.2% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 4 9 13 30.8% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 177 97 274 64.6% 96 45 141 68.1% 31 13 44 70.5% 94 50 144 65.3% — 31 58 89 34.8% 8 22 30 26.7% 2 10 12 16.7% 8 15 23 34.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anke Huber Jana Nejedly
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1989 1518 106.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.34 1–1 1–0 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1990 1709 138.4 — — — — +14 -175 — 57.7% +0.90 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1991 1959 161.7 — — — — -23 -215 -283 67.0% +1.21 6–5 (55%) 4–3 (57%) 104.1 -0.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1992 1974 163.5 — — — — +13 -112 -289 64.1% +1.16 7–6 (54%) 5–4 (56%) 102.2 -1.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1993 2059 162.3 — — — — -40 -16 -298 66.1% +0.98 13–4 (76%) 7–6 (54%) 107.2 -1.91 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1994 2030 158.8 — — — — -9 +18 — 64.5% +1.13 12–6 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 102.9 +0.55 1993 1463 89.4 — — — — +32 — — 0.0% -4.33 — — — +0.21
20 1995 2083 168.0 — — — — +12 -34 -316 66.2% +1.32 13–4 (76%) 6–5 (55%) 103.3 -1.78 1994 1468 119.4 — — — — +17 — — 28.6% -1.54 2–2 (50%) — — +0.14
21 1996 2032 160.5 — — — — +30 -42 -104 66.2% +1.29 17–6 (74%) 7–10 (41%) 99.9 +2.81 1995 1580 127.6 — — — — -12 — — 49.1% +0.02 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — -0.69
22 1997 1969 163.8 — — — — +39 -72 -51 57.6% +0.58 12–10 (55%) 5–6 (45%) 96.0 -1.85 1996 1552 113.3 — — — — +10 — — 34.5% -1.14 1–4 (20%) 0–3 (0%) 95.3 -0.52
23 1998 1900 158.7 — — — — +4 — — 55.0% +0.39 9–7 (56%) 3–7 (30%) 93.2 -0.86 1997 1541 109.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.12
24 1999 1872 155.9 — — — — +5 -59 -11 52.6% +0.17 11–10 (52%) 5–5 (50%) 97.6 -1.51 1998 1556 109.7 — — — — +2 -49 — 31.0% -1.31 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — -1.14
25 2000 1896 145.4 — — — — -95 +65 +31 60.0% +0.73 10–7 (59%) 7–7 (50%) 99.9 +0.44 1999 1496 102.5 — — — — +42 -14 — 27.5% -1.72 3–1 (75%) 1–0 — +0.67
26 2001 1834 151.0 — — — — +12 +62 +138 62.2% +0.78 8–9 (47%) 8–4 (67%) 99.3 +0.22 2000 1528 107.0 — — — — -2 -12 -40 36.5% -1.16 7–3 (70%) 3–4 (43%) 105.5 +0.89
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1520 113.4 — — — — +22 -60 — 36.8% -0.88 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) 96.7 +0.87
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1423 84.2 — — — — +66 — — 23.3% -1.97 1–1 1–1 — +1.39
Career — 2123 165.4 — — — — +2 -32 -124 61.8% +0.88 123–79 (61%) 66–63 (51%) 100.5 -1.02 — 1625 113.2 — — — — +15 -29 -40 34.0% -1.19 21–21 (50%) 8–15 (35%) 101.1 +1.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.