H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Ann Henricksson vs Ivanna Madruga H2H: 0-2
Ivanna Madruga holds a 2–0 lead over Ann Henricksson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ivanna Madruga leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Ivanna Madruga won the 1986 Roland Garros first round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 1986* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Ivanna Madruga | 6-3 7-5 | Ann Henricksson | Match data |
| May 6, 1982* | Perugia | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Ivanna Madruga | 6-1 6-0 | Ann Henricksson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Henricksson | #892 | #36 | 21 | 1,756 | 147 | 210 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ivanna Madruga | — | — | — | 1,916 | 131 | 88 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ann Henricksson | Ivanna Madruga | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 29–18 | 61.7% | — | 1,799 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,753 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 27–13 | 67.5% | — | 1,823 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1982 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 25–12 | 67.6% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1983 | 9–19 | 32.1% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 14–8 | 63.6% | — | 1,830 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1984 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #40 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1985 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #36 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1986 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #49 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1987 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #60 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1988 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #71 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1989 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #53 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1990 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #114 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1991 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #142 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1992 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1993 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #141 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1994 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #215 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |