H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ann Kiyomura Hayashi vs Bettina Bunge H2H: 1-3
Bettina Bunge holds a 3–1 lead over Ann Kiyomura Hayashi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Bettina Bunge leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Ann Kiyomura Hayashi leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Bettina Bunge won the 1981 Australian Open third round 6-0 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 70
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
GER
Age 63
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 1981* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Bettina Bunge | 6-0 6-4 | Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | Match data |
| Sep 20, 1981* | Tokyo Sillook | WTA 250 | F | Carpet | Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | 6-4 7-5 | Bettina Bunge | Match data |
| Sep 4, 1981* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Bettina Bunge | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | Match data |
| Jul 30, 1981* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Bettina Bunge | 6-1 6-4 | Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | — | — | — | 1,924 | 182 | 200 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Bettina Bunge | #135 | #8 | 58 | 2,123 | 294 | 182 | 61.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | Bettina Bunge | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 12 | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 13 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1972 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 16–20 | 44.4% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1973 | 28–30 | 48.3% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 31–23 | 57.4% | — | 1,882 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1974 | 24–13 | 64.9% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 50–23 | 68.5% | — | 2,023 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1975 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 43–21 | 67.2% | — | 2,019 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1976 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 26–11 | 70.3% | — | 2,012 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1977 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #21 | 1,908 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1978 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,803 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #22 | 1,846 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1979 | 26–22 | 54.2% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #12 | 2,014 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1980 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #15 | 1,925 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1981 | 23–19 | 54.8% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1982 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,827 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #72 | 1,903 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1983 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1984 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |