H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ann Kiyomura Hayashi vs Elly Appel H2H: 0-2
Elly Appel holds a 2–0 lead over Ann Kiyomura Hayashi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Elly Appel leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Elly Appel won the 1973 London round-robin match 6-0 1-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 1973 | London | WTA 250 | RR | Carpet | Elly Appel | 6-0 1-0 (ret.) | Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | Match data |
| Oct 25, 1973* | Port Talbot | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Elly Appel | 3-6 7-6 6-2 | Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | — | — | — | 1,924 | 182 | 200 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Elly Appel | — | — | — | 1,717 | 64 | 80 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | Elly Appel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,639 | 0 | 1 |
| 1972 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 1973 | 28–30 | 48.3% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 1974 | 24–13 | 64.9% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 2 |
| 1975 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 3 |
| 1976 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,668 | 0 | 3 |
| 1977 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,647 | 0 | 3 |
| 1978 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,803 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 3 |
| 1979 | 26–22 | 54.2% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1980 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 23–19 | 54.8% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,827 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |