H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Ann Kiyomura Hayashi vs Pam Casale H2H: 2-0
Ann Kiyomura Hayashi holds a 2–0 lead over Pam Casale in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ann Kiyomura Hayashi leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ann Kiyomura Hayashi won the 1982 Tampa third round 3-6 6-0 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 70
Right-Handed
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 1982* | Tampa | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | 3-6 6-0 6-4 | Pam Casale | Match data |
| Apr 1, 1981* | Boise | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | 6-1 6-4 | Pam Casale | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | — | — | — | 1,924 | 182 | 200 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Pam Casale | #671 | #14 | 22 | 1,944 | 168 | 147 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | Pam Casale | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 12 | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 13 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1972 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1973 | 28–30 | 48.3% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 30–17 | 63.8% | — | 1,811 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1974 | 24–13 | 64.9% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 20–23 | 46.5% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1975 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1976 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #15 | 1,914 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1977 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #14 | 1,814 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1978 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,803 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #41 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1979 | 26–22 | 54.2% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #111 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1980 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #169 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1981 | 23–19 | 54.8% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1982 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,827 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #554 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1983 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1984 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |