H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Ann Li vs Madison Brengle H2H: 1-0

Ann Li holds a 1–0 lead over Madison Brengle in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ann Li leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ann Li won the 2022 Indian Wells Open first round 1-6 7-6(5) 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ann Li
United States Age 26 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Madison Brengle
United States Age 36 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ann Li #64 1-6 7-6(5) 6-0 Madison Brengle #56 Match data Mar 11, 2022* R128 Indian Wells Open WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ann Li #28 #28 1,683 1,844 95 85 52.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Madison Brengle #212 #35 1,324 1,722 94 152 38.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ann Li Madison Brengle
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2007 1–3 25.0% #229 1,501 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2008 0–3 0.0% #220 1,457 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2009 1–2 33.3% #165 1,457 0 0
20 2020 3–4 42.9% #98 1,613 0 0 2010 0–1 0.0% #188 1,447 0 0
21 2021 19–10 65.5% #47 1,755 0 1 2011 1–1 50.0% #197 1,460 0 0
22 2022 11–16 40.7% #129 1,666 0 1 2012 0–1 0.0% #191 1,444 0 0
23 2023 1–4 20.0% #169 1,668 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 2024 7–5 58.3% #96 1,706 0 1 2014 4–4 50.0% #95 1,474 0 0
25 2025 30–23 56.6% #38 1,816 0 2 2015 25–26 49.0% #40 1,622 0 0
26 2026 24–23 51.1% #28 1,792 0 2 2016 16–23 41.0% #73 1,591 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2017 10–18 35.7% #83 1,654 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2018 3–11 21.4% #88 1,604 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2019 7–11 38.9% #95 1,601 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2020 2–4 33.3% #82 1,644 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2021 6–14 30.0% #59 1,645 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2022 12–16 42.9% #57 1,630 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2023 6–14 30.0% #151 1,583 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ann Li Madison Brengle
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2020 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2021 17 7 24 70.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2022 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2023 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2024 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2014 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2025 21 15 36 58.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2015 19 16 35 54.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2026 13 14 27 48.1% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2016 10 16 26 38.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 6 14 20 30.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1 7 8 12.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 2 8 10 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 4 9 13 30.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
Career — 68 59 127 53.5% 19 15 34 55.9% 8 11 19 42.1% — 65 103 168 38.7% 17 31 48 35.4% 12 18 30 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 165/181 of Ann Li's and 225/246 of Madison Brengle's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ann Li Madison Brengle
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 4/4 0.8 3.0 60.2% 57.4% 40.8% 48.9% 50.7% 50.5% 41.0%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 2/3 0.0 3.0 66.3% 49.4% 35.3% 12.5% 63.6% 45.2% 37.3%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 3/3 0.0 3.7 61.8% 56.2% 38.6% 41.1% 37.6% 49.3% 43.5%
20 2020 7/7 1.6 1.4 65.4% 60.3% 45.8% 47.0% 36.5% 55.3% 40.2% 2010 1/1 1.0 7.0 53.7% 44.4% 38.7% 50.0% 50.0% 41.8% 47.2%
21 2021 29/29 2.0 2.8 60.3% 63.9% 50.2% 57.1% 48.1% 58.7% 47.0% 2011 2/2 0.5 3.5 63.9% 56.3% 44.7% 38.9% 40.0% 52.0% 35.6%
22 2022 25/27 1.8 2.7 60.9% 61.1% 44.6% 53.2% 42.5% 54.5% 40.9% 2012 1/1 5.0 8.0 65.2% 61.3% 35.0% 30.0% 83.3% 52.2% 41.7%
23 2023 5/5 2.4 2.2 54.4% 63.4% 45.2% 51.9% 43.3% 54.6% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2024 12/12 1.7 2.3 66.0% 65.9% 44.5% 51.4% 45.0% 58.5% 47.5% 2014 7/8 0.7 3.0 66.2% 62.5% 42.8% 49.4% 47.3% 55.7% 44.3%
25 2025 42/54 4.5 2.4 58.4% 66.4% 48.0% 50.5% 45.8% 58.6% 44.4% 2015 35/51 1.7 1.9 66.0% 61.5% 48.8% 42.8% 46.6% 57.2% 41.3%
26 2026 45/47 4.8 2.8 58.5% 67.8% 45.0% 57.2% 47.2% 58.4% 42.0% 2016 37/39 0.9 2.2 68.5% 56.8% 45.7% 46.0% 54.9% 53.2% 43.1%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 28/28 0.1 2.5 73.3% 54.5% 39.2% 43.7% 45.2% 50.6% 44.1%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 14/14 0.4 2.7 66.6% 50.4% 43.5% 42.0% 45.0% 48.4% 43.5%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 18/18 0.2 2.2 73.8% 51.9% 37.5% 39.8% 54.6% 48.3% 47.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 6/6 0.2 3.7 72.6% 50.8% 44.5% 45.3% 38.1% 49.0% 48.3%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 20/20 0.0 3.1 74.5% 55.6% 39.8% 42.5% 48.0% 51.4% 44.1%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 27/28 0.4 2.9 73.1% 55.8% 39.7% 41.5% 47.1% 51.3% 44.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 20/20 0.3 2.7 75.1% 54.6% 41.7% 40.9% 51.5% 51.4% 43.0%
Career — 165/181 3.3 2.6 59.9% 65.2% 46.6% 53.8% 45.6% 57.7% 43.5% — 225/246 0.6 2.6 70.3% 55.9% 42.5% 42.8% 49.0% 52.0% 43.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ann Li Madison Brengle
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1502 111.1 0.00 +0.02 0.829 46.5% +16 — — 25.0% -1.75 — — — -0.27
18 2018 1511 99.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1458 92.5 -3.04 -1.39 0.681 41.4% — — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — +0.40
19 2019 1527 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1457 101.5 -2.95 -0.91 0.858 46.1% — — — 33.3% -1.17 — 0–1 — +0.06
20 2020 1613 127.7 -1.21 -0.60 0.898 47.9% +17 — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 2–0 — +0.13 2010 1447 99.2 -3.58 -2.65 0.810 44.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00
21 2021 1755 141.4 +1.81 +2.79 1.138 52.9% +27 — -163 62.5% +0.88 4–4 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 102.3 +0.04 2011 1460 101.5 -2.09 -1.94 0.741 44.6% — — — 50.0% -1.25 — 1–0 — +0.03
22 2022 1667 126.3 -1.81 -0.68 0.898 48.0% +42 — -81 42.6% -0.41 5–4 (56%) 2–6 (25%) 97.9 -1.14 2012 1444 99.4 -2.21 +0.67 0.871 47.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.16
23 2023 1669 123.4 -0.74 -1.07 0.814 46.1% +18 — — 25.0% -1.50 1–1 1–0 — -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2024 1706 123.8 +0.97 +1.36 1.145 52.8% -63 +90 — 53.6% +0.72 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — +0.29 2014 1474 113.6 -0.29 +1.12 1.002 50.0% +31 — — 42.9% -0.64 0–2 1–1 — +0.14
25 2025 1817 139.2 +1.60 +0.86 1.071 51.3% -21 -53 -232 55.6% +0.32 9–9 (50%) 9–7 (56%) 102.2 -1.29 2015 1622 128.8 -0.60 -0.18 0.964 49.3% +5 -83 — 48.7% -0.07 7–8 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 100.8 +0.20
26 2026 1792 142.7 +1.18 -0.52 1.008 50.2% -16 +23 -173 49.1% +0.06 12–10 (55%) 7–8 (47%) 102.5 +1.69 2016 1592 127.1 -1.99 +0.54 0.921 48.3% +5 -75 +29 42.4% -0.75 7–6 (54%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 -1.69
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1654 130.5 -4.01 +1.14 0.892 47.3% -26 -55 -1 38.2% -0.78 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 102.1 -1.74
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1605 118.6 -4.52 +0.81 0.843 45.8% -20 -29 — 33.3% -1.36 2–5 (29%) 0–2 — -1.35
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1602 115.2 -5.23 +2.99 0.913 47.8% -46 -26 — 42.1% -0.68 0–2 2–1 (67%) — -0.29
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1644 121.9 -2.92 +1.95 0.947 48.8% -1 — — 42.9% -1.07 0–2 2–0 — -0.11
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1645 119.5 -3.17 +0.46 0.907 47.7% +15 -91 +14 34.8% -1.00 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.62
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1631 135.0 -3.81 +1.21 0.902 47.6% +61 -46 -100 42.6% -0.72 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.1 -0.90
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1583 118.6 -4.39 -0.51 0.886 47.1% +13 +7 -81 34.9% -1.26 0–5 (0%) 4–4 (50%) 95.1 -0.79
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1572 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1521 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1845 141.5 +0.77 +0.51 1.027 50.6% -1 -2 -150 51.4% +0.17 35–29 (55%) 26–24 (52%) 106.2 -0.33 — 1723 129.4 -2.95 +0.67 0.906 47.8% +6 -59 -14 40.6% -0.76 27–45 (38%) 25–22 (53%) 98.9 -2.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.