H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Anna Blinkova vs Kamilla Rakhimova H2H: 2-1
Anna Blinkova holds a 2–1 lead over Kamilla Rakhimova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kamilla Rakhimova leads 1–0 on clay, while Anna Blinkova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anna Blinkova won the 2025 Nottingham third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 27
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
UZB
Age 24
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2025 | Nottingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Anna Blinkova | 6-2 6-3 | Kamilla Rakhimova | Match data |
| Mar 19, 2025 | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Anna Blinkova | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Kamilla Rakhimova | Match data |
| Oct 19, 2022 | Rouen | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Kamilla Rakhimova | 7-6(4) 6-1 | Anna Blinkova | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Blinkova | #102 | #35 | 1,300 | 1,796 | 103 | 155 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Kamilla Rakhimova | #78 | #60 | 1,023 | 1,752 | 56 | 85 | 39.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna Blinkova | Kamilla Rakhimova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2017 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #138 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #155 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2018 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #95 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #120 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2019 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #61 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #94 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #61 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #99 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2021 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #154 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2022 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #97 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2023 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #50 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 | 2026 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #78 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2024 | 12–25 | 32.4% | #77 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2025 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #62 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2026 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #102 | 1,667 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |