H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Anna Blinkova vs Zarina Diyas H2H: 0-3
Zarina Diyas holds a 3–0 lead over Anna Blinkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Zarina Diyas leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Zarina Diyas won the 2020 Australian Open second round 4-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 27
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
KAZ
Age 32
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2020* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Zarina Diyas | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Anna Blinkova | Match data |
| Jan 9, 2020* | Shenzhen | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Zarina Diyas | 6-1 6-7(9) 6-4 | Anna Blinkova | Match data |
| Sep 28, 2019 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Anna Blinkova | 6-2 7-5 | Zarina Diyas | Match data |
| Feb 1, 2018* | Taipei | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Zarina Diyas | 6-2 7-5 | Anna Blinkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Blinkova | #102 | #35 | 1,300 | 1,796 | 103 | 155 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Zarina Diyas | #437 | #31 | 1,495 | 1,751 | 99 | 127 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna Blinkova | Zarina Diyas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #242 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #227 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2017 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #138 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2018 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #95 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2019 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #61 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #33 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #61 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #52 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2021 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #154 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #150 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2022 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #66 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2023 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #50 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #89 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2024 | 12–25 | 32.4% | #77 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #77 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2025 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #62 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #80 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2026 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #102 | 1,667 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #102 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1031 | 1,680 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |