H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anna Chakvetadze vs Ai Sugiyama H2H: 2-0

Anna Chakvetadze holds a 2–0 lead over Ai Sugiyama in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anna Chakvetadze leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna Chakvetadze won the 2007 San Diego round of 16 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anna Chakvetadze
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Ai Sugiyama
JPN Age 51 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anna Chakvetadze #6 6-4 6-4 Ai Sugiyama #30 Match data Aug 3, 2007* R16 San Diego Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Anna Chakvetadze #9 6-4 6-4 Ai Sugiyama #26 Match data Jun 2, 2007* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anna Chakvetadze #577 #5 2,940 2,066 183 135 57.5% 0 1 0 2 5 8
Ai Sugiyama #97 #8 2,400 1,951 416 366 53.2% 0 0 0 2 4 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anna Chakvetadze Ai Sugiyama
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1992 1–4 20.0% #184 1,477 0 0
17 2004 2–3 40.0% #83 1,527 0 0 1993 3–8 27.3% #145 1,486 0 0
18 2005 24–21 53.3% #32 1,715 0 0 1994 9–11 45.0% #72 1,556 0 0
19 2006 37–20 64.9% #13 1,914 0 2 1995 16–17 48.5% #46 1,665 0 0
20 2007 56–19 74.7% #6 1,988 0 6 1996 24–19 55.8% #28 1,751 0 0
21 2008 26–23 53.1% #18 1,723 0 7 1997 31–25 55.4% #21 1,837 0 1
22 2009 14–18 43.8% #67 1,714 0 7 1998 37–21 63.8% #18 1,862 0 3
23 2010 18–15 54.5% #56 1,714 0 8 1999 27–23 54.0% #24 1,807 0 3
24 2011 3–8 27.3% #234 1,640 0 8 2000 20–25 44.4% #32 1,679 0 3
25 2012 3–8 27.3% #224 1,555 0 8 2001 28–25 52.8% #30 1,718 0 3
26 — — — — — — — 2002 35–26 57.4% #24 1,755 0 3
27 — — — — — — — 2003 44–25 63.8% #10 1,915 0 5
28 — — — — — — — 2004 33–23 58.9% #17 1,808 0 6
29 — — — — — — — 2005 28–27 50.9% #29 1,741 0 6
30 — — — — — — — 2006 28–25 52.8% #26 1,743 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 2007 17–21 44.7% #38 1,633 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 2008 26–22 54.2% #31 1,713 0 6
33 — — — — — — — 2009 9–19 32.1% #97 1,627 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anna Chakvetadze Ai Sugiyama
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
17 2004 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
18 2005 15 12 27 55.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
19 2006 23 11 34 67.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 1995 5 8 13 38.5% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
20 2007 39 13 52 75.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 1 8 87.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 1996 19 11 30 63.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 2008 13 16 29 44.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 0 4 100.0% 1997 19 13 32 59.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
22 2009 9 12 21 42.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1998 24 9 33 72.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 5 11 54.5%
23 2010 14 10 24 58.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1999 18 11 29 62.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
24 2011 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2000 11 13 24 45.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6%
25 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 20 14 34 58.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 26 16 42 61.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 29 16 45 64.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 22 14 36 61.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 20 17 37 54.1% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 22 18 40 55.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 10 15 25 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 20 15 35 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 7 13 20 35.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
Career — 121 86 207 58.5% 29 30 59 49.2% 22 15 37 59.5% 11 4 15 73.3% — 280 216 496 56.5% 59 67 126 46.8% 38 39 77 49.4% 39 44 83 47.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anna Chakvetadze Ai Sugiyama
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1478 102.6 — — — — +34 — — 30.8% -1.31 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — +0.31
17 2004 1528 120.5 +0.93 +0.41 0.997 50.0% +25 — — 46.2% -0.15 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.22 1993 1487 125.5 — — — — +44 — — 37.0% -0.89 1–4 (20%) — — -0.26
18 2005 1716 140.9 -0.63 +0.16 0.934 48.6% -37 -113 -71 51.9% +0.09 10–6 (63%) 0–7 (0%) 103.3 -1.79 1994 1557 120.7 — — — — +41 — — 47.8% +0.13 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +1.49
19 2006 1915 148.0 +1.63 +1.41 1.040 50.8% -5 -246 -221 63.0% +0.79 10–5 (67%) 5–4 (56%) 107.1 -2.00 1995 1665 135.9 — — — — -9 -11 — 49.3% +0.23 4–7 (36%) 3–0 (100%) 101.9 +0.28
20 2007 1988 159.4 +3.68 +3.72 1.156 53.1% +9 -222 -132 69.6% +1.32 15–4 (79%) 11–10 (52%) 107.4 -0.45 1996 1751 143.7 — — — — -8 -156 -152 54.3% +0.29 5–5 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 99.1 +0.30
21 2008 1724 136.7 -0.16 +2.53 1.031 50.8% +43 -1 +130 53.3% +0.29 12–14 (46%) 4–6 (40%) 92.8 +2.95 1997 1837 150.1 — — — — +27 -234 -204 51.5% 0.00 14–8 (64%) 11–8 (58%) 106.9 -1.35
22 2009 1714 134.0 -0.92 +1.31 0.958 49.2% +9 +9 +92 45.7% -0.32 8–9 (47%) 6–5 (55%) 98.5 -0.09 1998 1862 153.1 — — — — +57 -206 -239 60.3% +0.68 12–5 (71%) 9–4 (69%) 107.7 +0.41
23 2010 1714 128.7 -0.49 +1.32 1.020 50.4% +15 -55 +111 56.8% +0.36 6–6 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 97.6 -0.41 1999 1808 151.0 — — — — +46 -168 -203 53.0% +0.21 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) 99.6 -1.12
24 2011 1641 112.2 +0.12 +1.73 0.980 49.6% +60 — — 37.5% -0.88 — 1–1 — -0.46 2000 1679 137.5 — — — — +24 +5 -92 46.1% -0.54 5–7 (42%) 7–5 (58%) 99.7 -0.80
25 2012 1556 102.0 -1.55 -1.87 0.886 47.7% +83 +20 — 36.4% -0.91 0–2 0–1 — +0.48 2001 1719 138.7 — — — — +19 -57 -121 53.7% +0.17 10–11 (48%) 6–2 (75%) 102.9 -0.48
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1755 141.6 — — — — +15 -109 -67 56.1% +0.32 9–8 (53%) 8–6 (57%) 100.6 -0.40
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1915 154.1 +1.48 +3.41 1.113 52.2% -8 -157 -164 58.3% +0.63 22–10 (69%) 7–7 (50%) 105.4 +1.81
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1808 144.1 +0.61 +2.40 1.121 52.5% -4 -67 +28 57.5% +0.58 8–7 (53%) 4–8 (33%) 97.4 +2.38
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1742 133.4 -1.10 -0.52 0.908 47.7% +17 -41 -12 51.1% +0.11 11–16 (41%) 6–4 (60%) 94.4 +2.95
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1744 138.5 -0.78 +0.79 0.988 49.8% +9 -91 +46 50.8% +0.14 10–8 (56%) 2–14 (13%) 94.4 +0.98
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1633 125.5 -2.23 +2.56 0.996 50.0% -7 +43 +130 47.3% -0.13 8–9 (47%) 5–4 (56%) 98.7 +1.74
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1713 136.4 -0.29 +1.82 0.995 49.6% +26 -71 +32 48.5% -0.19 8–5 (62%) 5–5 (50%) 105.2 +0.32
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1627 135.9 -1.68 -1.34 0.871 46.9% +43 -37 +108 35.6% -0.86 2–5 (29%) 4–3 (57%) 100.4 -0.98
Career — 2067 147.7 +0.95 +1.99 1.038 50.8% +11 -114 -36 56.9% +0.44 62–48 (56%) 29–38 (43%) 99.6 -0.63 — 1952 148.1 -0.87 +1.32 0.986 49.6% +18 -90 -55 52.1% +0.15 142–128 (53%) 85–81 (51%) 103.0 +0.97

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.