H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Anna Chakvetadze vs Akiko Morigami H2H: 1-2
Akiko Morigami holds a 2–1 lead over Anna Chakvetadze in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Akiko Morigami leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anna Chakvetadze won the 2007 Cincinnati final 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 46
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2007* | Cincinnati | WTA 500 | F | Hard | Anna Chakvetadze | 6-1 6-3 | Akiko Morigami | Match data |
| May 17, 2006* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Akiko Morigami | 4-6 6-2 4-2 (ret.) | Anna Chakvetadze | Match data |
| Aug 6, 2005* | San Diego | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Akiko Morigami | 6-3 6-4 | Anna Chakvetadze | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Chakvetadze | #577 | #5 | 2,940 | 2,067 | 183 | 135 | 57.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
| Akiko Morigami | #402 | #41 | 775 | 1,714 | 78 | 108 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna Chakvetadze | Akiko Morigami | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #32 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #13 | 1,936 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2007 | 56–19 | 74.7% | #6 | 1,984 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2008 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #18 | 1,721 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2009 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #67 | 1,711 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #143 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #56 | 1,715 | 0 | 8 | 2003 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #62 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #234 | 1,641 | 0 | 8 | 2004 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #67 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #224 | 1,557 | 0 | 8 | 2005 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #49 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #87 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #49 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #252 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #407 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |