H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anna Chakvetadze vs Alicia Molik H2H: 1-0
Anna Chakvetadze holds a 1–0 lead over Alicia Molik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anna Chakvetadze leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anna Chakvetadze won the 2007 Roland Garros first round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2007* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Anna Chakvetadze | 6-2 6-3 | Alicia Molik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Chakvetadze | #577 | #5 | 2,940 | 2,067 | 183 | 135 | 57.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
| Alicia Molik | #403 | #8 | 2,630 | 2,035 | 151 | 161 | 48.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna Chakvetadze | Alicia Molik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #32 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #96 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #13 | 1,936 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 56–19 | 74.7% | #6 | 1,984 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #47 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #18 | 1,721 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #94 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #67 | 1,711 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #36 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2010 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #56 | 1,715 | 0 | 8 | 2004 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #13 | 1,938 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2011 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #234 | 1,641 | 0 | 8 | 2005 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #28 | 1,779 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2012 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #224 | 1,557 | 0 | 8 | 2006 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #165 | 1,632 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #56 | 1,628 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #308 | 1,577 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,561 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,584 | 0 | 5 |