H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Anna Chakvetadze vs Anne Keothavong H2H: 2-0
Anna Chakvetadze holds a 2–0 lead over Anne Keothavong in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anna Chakvetadze leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna Chakvetadze won the 2010 Indian Wells first round 2-6 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 42
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2010* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Anna Chakvetadze | 2-6 6-3 6-1 | Anne Keothavong | Match data |
| Jan 21, 2009* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Anna Chakvetadze | 6-1 6-7(4) 6-1 | Anne Keothavong | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Chakvetadze | #577 | #5 | 2,940 | 2,067 | 183 | 135 | 57.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
| Anne Keothavong | #287 | #48 | 1,315 | 1,633 | 48 | 89 | 35.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna Chakvetadze | Anne Keothavong | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #32 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #13 | 1,936 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 56–19 | 74.7% | #6 | 1,984 | 0 | 6 | 2004 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #180 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #18 | 1,721 | 0 | 7 | 2005 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #236 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #67 | 1,711 | 0 | 7 | 2006 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,400 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #56 | 1,715 | 0 | 8 | 2007 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #132 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #234 | 1,641 | 0 | 8 | 2008 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #60 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #224 | 1,557 | 0 | 8 | 2009 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #100 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #121 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #143 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |