H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anna Chakvetadze vs Arantxa Parra Santonja H2H: 1-0
Anna Chakvetadze holds a 1–0 lead over Arantxa Parra Santonja in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anna Chakvetadze leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna Chakvetadze won the 2005 Australian Open first round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 43
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2005* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Anna Chakvetadze | 6-3 6-2 | Arantxa Parra Santonja | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Chakvetadze | #577 | #5 | 2,940 | 2,067 | 183 | 135 | 57.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
| Arantxa Parra Santonja | #858 | #46 | 1,231 | 1,625 | 71 | 120 | 37.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna Chakvetadze | Arantxa Parra Santonja | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #32 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #13 | 1,936 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2007 | 56–19 | 74.7% | #6 | 1,984 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #67 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #18 | 1,721 | 0 | 7 | 2004 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #67 | 1,711 | 0 | 7 | 2005 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #109 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #56 | 1,715 | 0 | 8 | 2006 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #175 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #234 | 1,641 | 0 | 8 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #224 | 1,557 | 0 | 8 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #299 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #93 | 1,409 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #117 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #242 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |