H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Anna Chakvetadze vs Barbara Schett H2H: 1-0
Anna Chakvetadze holds a 1–0 lead over Barbara Schett in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anna Chakvetadze leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna Chakvetadze won the 2004 US Open first round 1-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 50
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2004* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Anna Chakvetadze | 1-6 6-4 6-2 | Barbara Schett | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Chakvetadze | #577 | #5 | 2,940 | 2,067 | 183 | 135 | 57.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
| Barbara Schett | #97 | #7 | 2,188 | 1,975 | 256 | 227 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna Chakvetadze | Barbara Schett | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #32 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #100 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #13 | 1,936 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #83 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 56–19 | 74.7% | #6 | 1,984 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,759 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2008 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #18 | 1,721 | 0 | 7 | 1997 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2009 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #67 | 1,711 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #23 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2010 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #56 | 1,715 | 0 | 8 | 1999 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,936 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2011 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #234 | 1,641 | 0 | 8 | 2000 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #22 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2012 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #224 | 1,557 | 0 | 8 | 2001 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #21 | 1,757 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #40 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #76 | 1,624 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,590 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,591 | 0 | 3 |