H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Anna Chakvetadze vs Elena Likhovtseva H2H: 1-0
Anna Chakvetadze holds a 1–0 lead over Elena Likhovtseva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anna Chakvetadze leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna Chakvetadze won the 2005 San Diego fourth round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 50
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2005* | San Diego | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Anna Chakvetadze | 6-3 6-1 | Elena Likhovtseva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Chakvetadze | #577 | #5 | 2,940 | 2,067 | 183 | 135 | 57.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
| Elena Likhovtseva | #1,092 | #15 | 1,807 | 1,912 | 358 | 338 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna Chakvetadze | Elena Likhovtseva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #67 | 1,633 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2005 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #32 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #62 | 1,736 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2006 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #13 | 1,936 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2007 | 56–19 | 74.7% | #6 | 1,984 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #18 | 1,819 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2008 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #18 | 1,721 | 0 | 7 | 1997 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2009 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #67 | 1,711 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 35–29 | 54.7% | #26 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2010 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #56 | 1,715 | 0 | 8 | 1999 | 34–29 | 54.0% | #18 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2011 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #234 | 1,641 | 0 | 8 | 2000 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #21 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2012 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #224 | 1,557 | 0 | 8 | 2001 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #42 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #24 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #17 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #43 | 1,695 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #62 | 1,665 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1044 | 1,634 | 0 | 3 |