H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Anna Chakvetadze vs Karolina Sprem H2H: 2-0
Anna Chakvetadze holds a 2–0 lead over Karolina Sprem in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anna Chakvetadze leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna Chakvetadze won the 2006 Miami first round 1-6 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 41
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2006* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Anna Chakvetadze | 1-6 6-3 6-3 | Karolina Sprem | Match data |
| Feb 17, 2005* | Antwerp | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Anna Chakvetadze | 7-5 6-3 | Karolina Sprem | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Chakvetadze | #577 | #5 | 2,940 | 2,067 | 183 | 135 | 57.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
| Karolina Sprem | #921 | #17 | 1,504 | 1,867 | 91 | 103 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna Chakvetadze | Karolina Sprem | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #32 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #59 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #13 | 1,936 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #18 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 56–19 | 74.7% | #6 | 1,984 | 0 | 6 | 2005 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #65 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #18 | 1,721 | 0 | 7 | 2006 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #89 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #67 | 1,711 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #209 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #56 | 1,715 | 0 | 8 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #234 | 1,641 | 0 | 8 | 2009 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #92 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #224 | 1,557 | 0 | 8 | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #817 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |