H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Anna Chakvetadze vs Katarina Srebotnik H2H: 2-2
Anna Chakvetadze and Katarina Srebotnik are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Katarina Srebotnik won the 2008 Sydney third round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 45
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2008* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Katarina Srebotnik | 7-5 6-1 | Anna Chakvetadze | Match data |
| Jul 28, 2007* | Stanford | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Anna Chakvetadze | 4-6 6-2 6-2 | Katarina Srebotnik | Match data |
| Oct 26, 2006* | Linz | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Anna Chakvetadze | 7-5 6-2 | Katarina Srebotnik | Match data |
| Feb 18, 2005* | Antwerp | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Katarina Srebotnik | 4-6 6-1 7-6(12) | Anna Chakvetadze | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Chakvetadze | #577 | #5 | 2,940 | 2,067 | 183 | 135 | 57.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
| Katarina Srebotnik | #704 | #20 | 2,474 | 1,845 | 224 | 204 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna Chakvetadze | Katarina Srebotnik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #32 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2006 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #13 | 1,936 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #120 | 1,484 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2007 | 56–19 | 74.7% | #6 | 1,984 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #97 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2008 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #18 | 1,721 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2009 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #67 | 1,711 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2010 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #56 | 1,715 | 0 | 8 | 2004 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #87 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2011 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #234 | 1,641 | 0 | 8 | 2005 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #27 | 1,752 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2012 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #224 | 1,557 | 0 | 8 | 2006 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #23 | 1,786 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,756 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #20 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #428 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #317 | 1,621 | 0 | 4 |