H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Anna Chakvetadze vs Magdalena Maleeva H2H: 2-1

Anna Chakvetadze holds a 2–1 lead over Magdalena Maleeva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Anna Chakvetadze leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Magdalena Maleeva won the 2005 Zurich third round 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anna Chakvetadze
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Magdalena Maleeva
BUL Age 51 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 20, 2005* Zurich WTA 1000 R32 Hard Magdalena Maleeva #61 6-1 6-1 Anna Chakvetadze #35 Match data
Sep 29, 2005* Luxembourg WTA 500 R32 Hard Anna Chakvetadze #36 7-5 2-6 6-4 Magdalena Maleeva #58 Match data
Jun 16, 2005* Eastbourne WTA 500 R32 Grass Anna Chakvetadze #43 6-7(0) 6-1 6-2 Magdalena Maleeva #38 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anna Chakvetadze #577 #5 2,940 2,067 183 135 57.5% 0 1 0 5 2 8
Magdalena Maleeva #401 #4 1,834 2,083 384 272 58.5% 0 2 0 2 6 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anna Chakvetadze Magdalena Maleeva
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1989 1–3 25.0% #216 1,497 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1990 12–10 54.5% #72 1,654 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1991 17–15 53.1% #38 1,718 0 0
17 2004 2–3 40.0% #83 1,526 0 0 1992 28–14 66.7% #20 1,908 0 1
18 2005 24–21 53.3% #32 1,716 0 0 1993 36–16 69.2% #16 1,962 0 1
19 2006 37–20 64.9% #13 1,936 0 2 1994 31–12 72.1% #11 1,980 0 3
20 2007 56–19 74.7% #6 1,984 0 6 1995 37–12 75.5% #6 2,029 0 6
21 2008 26–23 53.1% #18 1,721 0 7 1996 18–15 54.5% #19 1,908 0 6
22 2009 14–18 43.8% #67 1,711 0 7 1997 21–22 48.8% #36 1,746 0 6
23 2010 18–15 54.5% #56 1,715 0 8 1998 5–7 41.7% #116 1,713 0 6
24 2011 3–8 27.3% #234 1,641 0 8 1999 12–8 60.0% #76 1,737 0 7
25 2012 3–8 27.3% #224 1,557 0 8 2000 25–25 50.0% #23 1,813 0 7
26 — — — — — — — 2001 35–24 59.3% #16 1,849 0 8
27 — — — — — — — 2002 35–24 59.3% #14 1,855 0 9
28 — — — — — — — 2003 27–21 56.2% #30 1,746 0 10
29 — — — — — — — 2004 27–24 52.9% #25 1,710 0 10
30 — — — — — — — 2005 17–20 45.9% #53 1,682 0 10