H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anna Chakvetadze vs Martina Hingis H2H: 0-1

Martina Hingis holds a 1–0 lead over Anna Chakvetadze in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Martina Hingis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 2006 Canadian Open semifinal 6-3 3-1 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anna Chakvetadze
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Martina Hingis
SUI Age 45 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Martina Hingis #12 6-3 3-1 (ret.) Anna Chakvetadze #31 Match data Aug 19, 2006* SF Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anna Chakvetadze #577 #5 2,940 2,066 183 135 57.5% 0 1 0 2 5 8
Martina Hingis #19 #1 6,976 2,373 516 127 80.2% 5 17 2 16 3 43

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anna Chakvetadze Martina Hingis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1994 5–3 62.5% #87 1,595 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1995 18–12 60.0% #16 1,825 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1996 46–16 74.2% #4 2,157 0 2
16 — — — — — — — 1997 72–5 93.5% #1 2,313 3 14
17 2004 2–3 40.0% #83 1,527 0 0 1998 60–12 83.3% #2 2,264 4 19
18 2005 24–21 53.3% #32 1,715 0 0 1999 70–12 85.4% #1 2,287 5 26
19 2006 37–20 64.9% #13 1,914 0 2 2000 78–10 88.6% #1 2,318 5 35
20 2007 56–19 74.7% #6 1,988 0 6 2001 60–15 80.0% #4 2,126 5 38
21 2008 26–23 53.1% #18 1,723 0 7 2002 34–10 77.3% #10 2,051 5 40
22 2009 14–18 43.8% #67 1,714 0 7 — — — — — — —
23 2010 18–15 54.5% #56 1,714 0 8 — — — — — — —
24 2011 3–8 27.3% #234 1,640 0 8 2005 0–1 0.0% — 2,021 5 40
25 2012 3–8 27.3% #224 1,555 0 8 2006 53–19 73.6% #7 2,018 5 42
26 — — — — — — — 2007 20–12 62.5% #19 1,858 5 43

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anna Chakvetadze Martina Hingis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 10 7 17 58.8% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 19 6 25 76.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 13 3 16 81.3%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 39 2 41 95.1% 11 1 12 91.7% 7 0 7 100.0% 15 2 17 88.2%
17 2004 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 31 7 38 81.6% 16 2 18 88.9% 5 1 6 83.3% 8 2 10 80.0%
18 2005 15 12 27 55.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 40 6 46 87.0% 19 2 21 90.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 3 14 78.6%
19 2006 23 11 34 67.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 2000 43 6 49 87.8% 12 2 14 85.7% 8 1 9 88.9% 15 1 16 93.8%
20 2007 39 13 52 75.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 1 8 87.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 2001 39 7 46 84.8% 17 5 22 77.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
21 2008 13 16 29 44.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 0 4 100.0% 2002 28 8 36 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0%
22 2009 9 12 21 42.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2010 14 10 24 58.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2011 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 33 14 47 70.2% 14 3 17 82.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 13 10 23 56.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 0 4 100.0%
Career — 121 86 207 58.5% 29 30 59 49.2% 22 15 37 59.5% 11 4 15 73.3% — 299 76 375 79.7% 110 26 136 80.9% 27 8 35 77.1% 80 17 97 82.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 250/318 of Anna Chakvetadze's and 84/104 of Martina Hingis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anna Chakvetadze Martina Hingis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2004 3/5 3.3 5.3 61.2% 60.8% 43.7% 34.3% 55.6% 54.0% 45.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 13/45 1.8 4.8 58.2% 62.8% 38.8% 47.2% 39.5% 53.3% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 39/57 2.9 3.7 59.4% 64.2% 46.6% 54.3% 46.9% 57.0% 44.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 67/75 3.0 3.7 60.3% 66.4% 49.0% 57.7% 51.2% 59.4% 47.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2008 44/49 3.6 6.5 55.3% 64.7% 41.6% 55.3% 53.0% 54.3% 47.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2009 31/32 1.8 5.7 63.5% 60.6% 41.0% 48.9% 53.9% 53.4% 44.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2010 33/33 1.7 5.0 61.2% 60.5% 45.7% 53.6% 50.7% 55.1% 45.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2011 9/11 2.1 3.8 58.9% 60.7% 41.5% 50.7% 47.5% 53.1% 46.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2012 11/11 2.5 3.4 60.5% 62.6% 40.0% 44.4% 57.5% 53.5% 41.2% 2006 54/72 1.5 2.3 63.9% 63.4% 52.8% 56.5% 51.8% 59.3% 49.6%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 30/32 1.8 2.5 65.3% 65.3% 49.8% 55.4% 50.1% 59.7% 48.6%
Career — 250/318 2.7 4.7 59.7% 63.6% 44.6% 53.4% 50.7% 55.9% 45.7% — 84/643 1.6 2.3 64.4% 64.1% 51.8% 56.1% 51.2% 59.4% 49.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anna Chakvetadze Martina Hingis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1596 137.2 — — — — +29 — — 66.7% +1.72 0–2 0–1 — +0.60
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1826 156.2 — — — — -51 -101 — 54.1% +0.20 10–4 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 111.3 -2.22
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 2157 176.6 — — — — -18 -319 -474 70.9% +1.71 8–6 (57%) 3–2 (60%) 106.0 -2.29
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2313 180.8 — — — — -10 -282 -433 82.8% +2.49 20–4 (83%) 7–4 (64%) 109.7 -0.45
17 2004 1528 120.5 +0.93 +0.41 0.997 50.0% +25 — — 46.2% -0.15 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.22 1998 2264 179.3 — — — — +21 -97 -263 78.0% +2.11 11–7 (61%) 8–2 (80%) 99.7 -2.67
18 2005 1716 140.9 -0.63 +0.16 0.934 48.6% -37 -113 -71 51.9% +0.09 10–6 (63%) 0–7 (0%) 103.3 -1.79 1999 2287 181.2 — — — — +22 -52 — 81.3% +2.39 9–3 (75%) 9–6 (60%) 100.4 -1.79
19 2006 1915 148.0 +1.63 +1.41 1.040 50.8% -5 -246 -221 63.0% +0.79 10–5 (67%) 5–4 (56%) 107.1 -2.00 2000 2318 181.6 — — — — +43 -82 -242 83.9% +2.67 9–5 (64%) 5–4 (56%) 98.2 -3.02
20 2007 1988 159.4 +3.68 +3.72 1.156 53.1% +9 -222 -132 69.6% +1.32 15–4 (79%) 11–10 (52%) 107.4 -0.45 2001 2127 173.7 — — — — +111 +135 — 77.2% +2.15 9–5 (64%) 7–2 (78%) 99.1 -1.01
21 2008 1724 136.7 -0.16 +2.53 1.031 50.8% +43 -1 +130 53.3% +0.29 12–14 (46%) 4–6 (40%) 92.8 +2.95 2002 2051 167.3 — — — — +75 +179 — 74.0% +1.87 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 99.3 -0.76
22 2009 1714 134.0 -0.92 +1.31 0.958 49.2% +9 +9 +92 45.7% -0.32 8–9 (47%) 6–5 (55%) 98.5 -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2010 1714 128.7 -0.49 +1.32 1.020 50.4% +15 -55 +111 56.8% +0.36 6–6 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 97.6 -0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2011 1641 112.2 +0.12 +1.73 0.980 49.6% +60 — — 37.5% -0.88 — 1–1 — -0.46 2005 2022 100.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.01
25 2012 1556 102.0 -1.55 -1.87 0.886 47.7% +83 +20 — 36.4% -0.91 0–2 0–1 — +0.48 2006 2019 166.1 +3.76 +5.53 1.218 54.3% +7 +209 -3 71.3% +1.62 8–10 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 96.4 -3.22
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1859 147.6 +3.39 +4.14 1.205 54.0% +31 — +137 63.5% +1.15 3–7 (30%) 2–2 (50%) 91.3 +1.36
Career — 2067 147.7 +0.95 +1.99 1.038 50.8% +11 -114 -36 56.9% +0.44 62–48 (56%) 29–38 (43%) 99.6 -0.63 — 2373 179.5 +3.63 +5.03 1.214 54.2% +28 -50 -259 75.7% +1.99 92–57 (62%) 53–29 (65%) 103.7 -2.41

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.