H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Anna Chakvetadze vs Nicole Pratt H2H: 1-0
Anna Chakvetadze holds a 1–0 lead over Nicole Pratt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anna Chakvetadze leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna Chakvetadze won the 2007 US Open second round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 53
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2007* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Anna Chakvetadze | 6-3 6-4 | Nicole Pratt | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Chakvetadze | #577 | #5 | 2,940 | 2,067 | 183 | 135 | 57.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
| Nicole Pratt | #1,043 | #35 | 924 | 1,764 | 156 | 217 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna Chakvetadze | Nicole Pratt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #201 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #32 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #201 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #13 | 1,936 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #203 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 56–19 | 74.7% | #6 | 1,984 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #172 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #18 | 1,721 | 0 | 7 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #224 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #67 | 1,711 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #56 | 1,715 | 0 | 8 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #234 | 1,641 | 0 | 8 | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #110 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #224 | 1,557 | 0 | 8 | 1998 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #113 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #56 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #54 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #48 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #53 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #50 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #126 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #77 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1043 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 |