H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Nicole Vaidisova holds a 3–0 lead over Anna Chakvetadze in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nicole Vaidisova leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nicole Vaidisova won the 2008 Wimbledon fourth round 4-6 7-6(0) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicole Vaidisova | 4-6 7-6(0) 6-3 | Anna Chakvetadze | Match data | Jul 1, 2008* | R16 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
| Nicole Vaidisova | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | Anna Chakvetadze | Match data | Aug 5, 2006* | QF | San Diego | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Nicole Vaidisova | 6-2 6-1 | Anna Chakvetadze | Match data | Jan 19, 2006* | R64 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Chakvetadze | #577 | #5 | 2,940 | 2,066 | 183 | 135 | 57.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 8 |
| Nicole Vaidisova | #832 | #7 | 1,981 | 2,006 | 155 | 85 | 64.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna Chakvetadze | Nicole Vaidisova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 14–5 | 73.7% | #75 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 45–14 | 76.3% | #15 | 1,948 | 0 | 5 |
| 17 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 6 |
| 18 | 2005 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #32 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #12 | 1,954 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | 2006 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #13 | 1,914 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #41 | 1,703 | 0 | 6 |
| 20 | 2007 | 56–19 | 74.7% | #6 | 1,988 | 0 | 6 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #175 | 1,575 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 2008 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #18 | 1,723 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #666 | 1,576 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 2009 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #67 | 1,714 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2010 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #56 | 1,714 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2011 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #234 | 1,640 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2012 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #224 | 1,555 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #261 | 1,564 | 0 | 6 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Anna Chakvetadze | Nicole Vaidisova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 12 | 4 | 16 | 75.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 35 | 8 | 43 | 81.4% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2004 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2006 | 16 | 10 | 26 | 61.5% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% |
| 18 | 2005 | 15 | 12 | 27 | 55.6% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2007 | 24 | 9 | 33 | 72.7% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 19 | 2006 | 23 | 11 | 34 | 67.6% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | 2008 | 11 | 13 | 24 | 45.8% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2007 | 39 | 13 | 52 | 75.0% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 7 | 1 | 8 | 87.5% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2009 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 2008 | 13 | 16 | 29 | 44.8% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 4 | 0 | 4 | 100.0% | 2010 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2009 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 42.9% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2010 | 14 | 10 | 24 | 58.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2011 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2012 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 121 | 86 | 207 | 58.5% | 29 | 30 | 59 | 49.2% | 22 | 15 | 37 | 59.5% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | — | 105 | 54 | 159 | 66.0% | 26 | 17 | 43 | 60.5% | 18 | 10 | 28 | 64.3% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 250/318 of Anna Chakvetadze's and 161/240 of Nicole Vaidisova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Anna Chakvetadze | Nicole Vaidisova | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 15 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1/19 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 51.2% | 50.0% | 33.3% | 14.3% | 50.0% | 41.9% | 39.6% |
| 16 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 17/59 | 7.0 | 3.2 | 61.5% | 67.6% | 52.6% | 54.1% | 45.8% | 61.8% | 44.7% |
| 17 | 2004 | 3/5 | 3.3 | 5.3 | 61.2% | 60.8% | 43.7% | 34.3% | 55.6% | 54.0% | 45.8% | 2006 | 41/52 | 5.4 | 3.5 | 62.1% | 68.7% | 48.3% | 55.4% | 42.2% | 60.8% | 44.3% |
| 18 | 2005 | 13/45 | 1.8 | 4.8 | 58.2% | 62.8% | 38.8% | 47.2% | 39.5% | 53.3% | 43.6% | 2007 | 48/49 | 6.3 | 3.4 | 61.5% | 73.7% | 49.9% | 59.5% | 48.0% | 64.6% | 44.0% |
| 19 | 2006 | 39/57 | 2.9 | 3.7 | 59.4% | 64.2% | 46.6% | 54.3% | 46.9% | 57.0% | 44.8% | 2008 | 31/36 | 5.2 | 3.6 | 61.0% | 70.9% | 44.7% | 49.4% | 42.8% | 60.6% | 40.7% |
| 20 | 2007 | 67/75 | 3.0 | 3.7 | 60.3% | 66.4% | 49.0% | 57.7% | 51.2% | 59.4% | 47.0% | 2009 | 18/19 | 3.3 | 4.8 | 56.2% | 63.8% | 37.8% | 48.5% | 47.7% | 52.5% | 41.8% |
| 21 | 2008 | 44/49 | 3.6 | 6.5 | 55.3% | 64.7% | 41.6% | 55.3% | 53.0% | 54.3% | 47.1% | 2010 | 2/2 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 65.2% | 77.4% | 35.4% | 55.0% | 45.8% | 62.3% | 40.1% |
| 22 | 2009 | 31/32 | 1.8 | 5.7 | 63.5% | 60.6% | 41.0% | 48.9% | 53.9% | 53.4% | 44.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2010 | 33/33 | 1.7 | 5.0 | 61.2% | 60.5% | 45.7% | 53.6% | 50.7% | 55.1% | 45.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2011 | 9/11 | 2.1 | 3.8 | 58.9% | 60.7% | 41.5% | 50.7% | 47.5% | 53.1% | 46.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2012 | 11/11 | 2.5 | 3.4 | 60.5% | 62.6% | 40.0% | 44.4% | 57.5% | 53.5% | 41.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3/4 | 6.3 | 2.3 | 63.6% | 59.4% | 44.6% | 48.1% | 53.3% | 53.7% | 41.5% |
| Career | — | 250/318 | 2.7 | 4.7 | 59.7% | 63.6% | 44.6% | 53.4% | 50.7% | 55.9% | 45.7% | — | 161/240 | 5.6 | 3.6 | 61.0% | 69.8% | 47.0% | 54.2% | 45.3% | 60.9% | 43.1% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Anna Chakvetadze | Nicole Vaidisova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1672 | 120.2 | -1.78 | -0.72 | 0.682 | 40.6% | +8 | -112 | — | 60.5% | +0.53 | 7–0 (100%) | 1–0 | — | +0.63 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1948 | 146.7 | +3.98 | +0.60 | 1.172 | 53.0% | 0 | -245 | -351 | 67.2% | +1.49 | 16–2 (89%) | 8–9 (47%) | 110.8 | -0.34 |
| 17 | 2004 | 1528 | 120.5 | +0.93 | +0.41 | 0.997 | 50.0% | +25 | — | — | 46.2% | -0.15 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–1 | — | -0.22 | 2006 | 1937 | 151.5 | +4.00 | +0.94 | 1.131 | 52.3% | -11 | -77 | -249 | 63.2% | +0.93 | 11–8 (58%) | 4–7 (36%) | 98.8 | +0.48 |
| 18 | 2005 | 1716 | 140.9 | -0.63 | +0.16 | 0.934 | 48.6% | -37 | -113 | -71 | 51.9% | +0.09 | 10–6 (63%) | 0–7 (0%) | 103.3 | -1.79 | 2007 | 1955 | 155.4 | +7.77 | +1.32 | 1.244 | 54.1% | -8 | -61 | -138 | 70.1% | +1.39 | 6–7 (46%) | 6–4 (60%) | 100.0 | +0.64 |
| 19 | 2006 | 1915 | 148.0 | +1.63 | +1.41 | 1.040 | 50.8% | -5 | -246 | -221 | 63.0% | +0.79 | 10–5 (67%) | 5–4 (56%) | 107.1 | -2.00 | 2008 | 1703 | 127.8 | +3.94 | -2.60 | 1.033 | 50.4% | +35 | +79 | +129 | 47.7% | -0.15 | 7–7 (50%) | 1–5 (17%) | 92.1 | -0.26 |
| 20 | 2007 | 1988 | 159.4 | +3.68 | +3.72 | 1.156 | 53.1% | +9 | -222 | -132 | 69.6% | +1.32 | 15–4 (79%) | 11–10 (52%) | 107.4 | -0.45 | 2009 | 1576 | 103.2 | -2.86 | -1.96 | 0.879 | 47.1% | +83 | +121 | — | 36.6% | -1.02 | 2–1 (67%) | 2–0 | — | +1.38 |
| 21 | 2008 | 1724 | 136.7 | -0.16 | +2.53 | 1.031 | 50.8% | +43 | -1 | +130 | 53.3% | +0.29 | 12–14 (46%) | 4–6 (40%) | 92.8 | +2.95 | 2010 | 1577 | 105.4 | +1.21 | +0.70 | 1.062 | 51.9% | — | — | — | 60.0% | 0.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.09 |
| 22 | 2009 | 1714 | 134.0 | -0.92 | +1.31 | 0.958 | 49.2% | +9 | +9 | +92 | 45.7% | -0.32 | 8–9 (47%) | 6–5 (55%) | 98.5 | -0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2010 | 1714 | 128.7 | -0.49 | +1.32 | 1.020 | 50.4% | +15 | -55 | +111 | 56.8% | +0.36 | 6–6 (50%) | 1–3 (25%) | 97.6 | -0.41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2011 | 1641 | 112.2 | +0.12 | +1.73 | 0.980 | 49.6% | +60 | — | — | 37.5% | -0.88 | — | 1–1 | — | -0.46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2012 | 1556 | 102.0 | -1.55 | -1.87 | 0.886 | 47.7% | +83 | +20 | — | 36.4% | -0.91 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | +0.48 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1565 | 115.0 | -0.33 | +1.19 | 0.897 | 48.2% | +67 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.40 |
| Career | — | 2067 | 147.7 | +0.95 | +1.99 | 1.038 | 50.8% | +11 | -114 | -36 | 56.9% | +0.44 | 62–48 (56%) | 29–38 (43%) | 99.6 | -0.63 | — | 2006 | 146.1 | +4.19 | 0.00 | 1.102 | 51.8% | +10 | -78 | -113 | 60.3% | +0.77 | 49–27 (64%) | 23–26 (47%) | 103.4 | +0.93 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Jankovic | 7 | 3 | 10 | Jun 18, 2009 | H2H |
| Maria Sharapova | 1 | 7 | 8 | Jun 22, 2011 | H2H |
| Shahar Peer | 4 | 3 | 7 | Jan 14, 2012 | H2H |
| Maria Kirilenko | 3 | 4 | 7 | Mar 12, 2011 | H2H |
| Daniela Hantuchova | 5 | 2 | 7 | Feb 16, 2011 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Jankovic | 6 | 3 | 9 | Jan 12, 2008 | H2H |
| Samantha Stosur | 6 | 0 | 6 | Jun 26, 2008 | H2H |
| Ana Ivanovic | 1 | 4 | 5 | Mar 5, 2015 | H2H |
| Svetlana Kuznetsova | 0 | 5 | 5 | Mar 30, 2009 | H2H |
| Daniela Hantuchova | 4 | 1 | 5 | Jan 11, 2008 | H2H |