H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Anna Chakvetadze vs Nicole Vaidisova H2H: 0-3
Nicole Vaidisova holds a 3–0 lead over Anna Chakvetadze in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nicole Vaidisova leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nicole Vaidisova won the 2008 Wimbledon fourth round 4-6 7-6(0) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 37
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2008* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Nicole Vaidisova | 4-6 7-6(0) 6-3 | Anna Chakvetadze | Match data |
| Aug 5, 2006* | San Diego | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Nicole Vaidisova | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | Anna Chakvetadze | Match data |
| Jan 19, 2006* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Nicole Vaidisova | 6-2 6-1 | Anna Chakvetadze | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Chakvetadze | #577 | #5 | 2,940 | 2,067 | 183 | 135 | 57.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
| Nicole Vaidisova | #832 | #7 | 1,981 | 1,997 | 155 | 84 | 64.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna Chakvetadze | Nicole Vaidisova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 14–5 | 73.7% | #75 | 1,674 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 45–14 | 76.3% | #15 | 1,948 | 0 | 5 |
| 17 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #10 | 1,916 | 0 | 6 |
| 18 | 2005 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #32 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #12 | 1,946 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | 2006 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #13 | 1,936 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #41 | 1,711 | 0 | 6 |
| 20 | 2007 | 56–19 | 74.7% | #6 | 1,984 | 0 | 6 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #175 | 1,578 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 2008 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #18 | 1,721 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #666 | 1,579 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 2009 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #67 | 1,711 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2010 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #56 | 1,715 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2011 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #234 | 1,641 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2012 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #224 | 1,557 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #261 | 1,566 | 0 | 6 |