H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Tatiana Golovin holds a 3–2 lead over Anna Chakvetadze in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Tatiana Golovin leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tatiana Golovin won the 2007 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix round of 16 7-6(3) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatiana Golovin | 7-6(3) 6-1 | Anna Chakvetadze | Match data | Oct 5, 2007* | R16 | Porsche Tennis Grand Prix | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
| Anna Chakvetadze | 6-1 6-3 | Tatiana Golovin | Match data | Mar 22, 2007* | R32 | Miami Open | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Tatiana Golovin | 6-3 6-2 | Anna Chakvetadze | Match data | Sep 5, 2006* | R16 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Anna Chakvetadze | 6-4 6-4 | Tatiana Golovin | Match data | Aug 3, 2005* | R64 | San Diego | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Tatiana Golovin | 6-4 7-6(3) | Anna Chakvetadze | Match data | Jun 11, 2005* | QF | Birmingham | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Chakvetadze | #577 | #5 | 2,940 | 2,066 | 183 | 135 | 57.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 8 |
| Tatiana Golovin | #1,128 | #12 | 1,882 | 2,014 | 131 | 80 | 62.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna Chakvetadze | Tatiana Golovin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #358 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #27 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #32 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #22 | 1,831 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #13 | 1,914 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 43–17 | 71.7% | #13 | 1,982 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2007 | 56–19 | 74.7% | #6 | 1,988 | 0 | 6 | 2008 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #254 | 1,892 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2008 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #18 | 1,723 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2009 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #67 | 1,714 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2010 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #56 | 1,714 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2011 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #234 | 1,640 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2012 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #224 | 1,555 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Anna Chakvetadze | Tatiana Golovin | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 15 | 9 | 24 | 62.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% |
| 17 | 2004 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2005 | 21 | 15 | 36 | 58.3% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% |
| 18 | 2005 | 15 | 12 | 27 | 55.6% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2006 | 21 | 14 | 35 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 19 | 2006 | 23 | 11 | 34 | 67.6% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | 2007 | 32 | 14 | 46 | 69.6% | 8 | 1 | 9 | 88.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 20 | 2007 | 39 | 13 | 52 | 75.0% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 7 | 1 | 8 | 87.5% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2008 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2008 | 13 | 16 | 29 | 44.8% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 4 | 0 | 4 | 100.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2009 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 42.9% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2010 | 14 | 10 | 24 | 58.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2011 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2012 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 121 | 86 | 207 | 58.5% | 29 | 30 | 59 | 49.2% | 22 | 15 | 37 | 59.5% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | — | 92 | 57 | 149 | 61.7% | 15 | 12 | 27 | 55.6% | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 250/318 of Anna Chakvetadze's and 107/211 of Tatiana Golovin's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Anna Chakvetadze | Tatiana Golovin | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 15 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1/5 | 1.0 | 7.0 | 50.0% | 59.3% | 37.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 48.1% | 33.3% |
| 16 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 9/42 | 2.1 | 5.2 | 58.4% | 61.7% | 40.6% | 52.1% | 46.7% | 53.0% | 47.7% |
| 17 | 2004 | 3/5 | 3.3 | 5.3 | 61.2% | 60.8% | 43.7% | 34.3% | 55.6% | 54.0% | 45.8% | 2005 | 12/55 | 1.8 | 5.5 | 59.2% | 67.2% | 44.5% | 52.8% | 49.5% | 57.8% | 48.2% |
| 18 | 2005 | 13/45 | 1.8 | 4.8 | 58.2% | 62.8% | 38.8% | 47.2% | 39.5% | 53.3% | 43.6% | 2006 | 28/43 | 2.6 | 2.8 | 66.1% | 63.3% | 47.6% | 56.4% | 51.0% | 57.8% | 45.6% |
| 19 | 2006 | 39/57 | 2.9 | 3.7 | 59.4% | 64.2% | 46.6% | 54.3% | 46.9% | 57.0% | 44.8% | 2007 | 52/60 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 63.8% | 66.7% | 48.4% | 62.0% | 47.7% | 60.1% | 47.8% |
| 20 | 2007 | 67/75 | 3.0 | 3.7 | 60.3% | 66.4% | 49.0% | 57.7% | 51.2% | 59.4% | 47.0% | 2008 | 5/6 | 2.4 | 3.4 | 64.9% | 62.8% | 43.6% | 44.6% | 41.4% | 56.4% | 45.4% |
| 21 | 2008 | 44/49 | 3.6 | 6.5 | 55.3% | 64.7% | 41.6% | 55.3% | 53.0% | 54.3% | 47.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2009 | 31/32 | 1.8 | 5.7 | 63.5% | 60.6% | 41.0% | 48.9% | 53.9% | 53.4% | 44.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2010 | 33/33 | 1.7 | 5.0 | 61.2% | 60.5% | 45.7% | 53.6% | 50.7% | 55.1% | 45.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2011 | 9/11 | 2.1 | 3.8 | 58.9% | 60.7% | 41.5% | 50.7% | 47.5% | 53.1% | 46.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2012 | 11/11 | 2.5 | 3.4 | 60.5% | 62.6% | 40.0% | 44.4% | 57.5% | 53.5% | 41.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 250/318 | 2.7 | 4.7 | 59.7% | 63.6% | 44.6% | 53.4% | 50.7% | 55.9% | 45.7% | — | 107/211 | 2.7 | 3.5 | 63.4% | 65.2% | 46.8% | 57.3% | 48.8% | 58.3% | 47.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Anna Chakvetadze | Tatiana Golovin | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1480 | 104.4 | -1.25 | -1.00 | 0.643 | 41.4% | +46 | — | — | 33.3% | -0.50 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.07 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1749 | 139.2 | -0.81 | +2.08 | 1.016 | 50.5% | -50 | -271 | +70 | 58.1% | +0.63 | 6–6 (50%) | 4–6 (40%) | 98.9 | -1.07 |
| 17 | 2004 | 1528 | 120.5 | +0.93 | +0.41 | 0.997 | 50.0% | +25 | — | — | 46.2% | -0.15 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–1 | — | -0.22 | 2005 | 1770 | 139.7 | +1.57 | +1.88 | 1.144 | 53.0% | -21 | -181 | +35 | 60.2% | +0.68 | 9–13 (41%) | 8–5 (62%) | 98.5 | -0.53 |
| 18 | 2005 | 1716 | 140.9 | -0.63 | +0.16 | 0.934 | 48.6% | -37 | -113 | -71 | 51.9% | +0.09 | 10–6 (63%) | 0–7 (0%) | 103.3 | -1.79 | 2006 | 1831 | 151.9 | +1.85 | +1.96 | 1.079 | 51.7% | +15 | — | — | 59.4% | +0.92 | 7–7 (50%) | 5–10 (33%) | 98.9 | +0.88 |
| 19 | 2006 | 1915 | 148.0 | +1.63 | +1.41 | 1.040 | 50.8% | -5 | -246 | -221 | 63.0% | +0.79 | 10–5 (67%) | 5–4 (56%) | 107.1 | -2.00 | 2007 | 1983 | 161.9 | +4.08 | +4.22 | 1.198 | 53.9% | -19 | -194 | — | 70.6% | +1.52 | 9–7 (56%) | 6–1 (86%) | 106.1 | -0.34 |
| 20 | 2007 | 1988 | 159.4 | +3.68 | +3.72 | 1.156 | 53.1% | +9 | -222 | -132 | 69.6% | +1.32 | 15–4 (79%) | 11–10 (52%) | 107.4 | -0.45 | 2008 | 1893 | 111.5 | +0.56 | +1.03 | 1.040 | 50.9% | -2 | — | — | 40.0% | -0.20 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–1 | — | -0.16 |
| 21 | 2008 | 1724 | 136.7 | -0.16 | +2.53 | 1.031 | 50.8% | +43 | -1 | +130 | 53.3% | +0.29 | 12–14 (46%) | 4–6 (40%) | 92.8 | +2.95 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2009 | 1714 | 134.0 | -0.92 | +1.31 | 0.958 | 49.2% | +9 | +9 | +92 | 45.7% | -0.32 | 8–9 (47%) | 6–5 (55%) | 98.5 | -0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2010 | 1714 | 128.7 | -0.49 | +1.32 | 1.020 | 50.4% | +15 | -55 | +111 | 56.8% | +0.36 | 6–6 (50%) | 1–3 (25%) | 97.6 | -0.41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2011 | 1641 | 112.2 | +0.12 | +1.73 | 0.980 | 49.6% | +60 | — | — | 37.5% | -0.88 | — | 1–1 | — | -0.46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2012 | 1556 | 102.0 | -1.55 | -1.87 | 0.886 | 47.7% | +83 | +20 | — | 36.4% | -0.91 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | +0.48 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1865 | 95.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2067 | 147.7 | +0.95 | +1.99 | 1.038 | 50.8% | +11 | -114 | -36 | 56.9% | +0.44 | 62–48 (56%) | 29–38 (43%) | 99.6 | -0.63 | — | 2014 | 151.5 | +2.59 | +2.99 | 1.129 | 52.7% | -15 | -202 | +58 | 61.1% | +0.89 | 32–37 (46%) | 23–23 (50%) | 98.8 | -0.61 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Jankovic | 7 | 3 | 10 | Jun 18, 2009 | H2H |
| Maria Sharapova | 1 | 7 | 8 | Jun 22, 2011 | H2H |
| Shahar Peer | 4 | 3 | 7 | Jan 14, 2012 | H2H |
| Maria Kirilenko | 3 | 4 | 7 | Mar 12, 2011 | H2H |
| Daniela Hantuchova | 5 | 2 | 7 | Feb 16, 2011 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ana Ivanovic | 2 | 6 | 8 | Oct 19, 2007 | H2H |
| Nadia Petrova | 5 | 1 | 6 | Apr 8, 2007 | H2H |
| Francesca Schiavone | 4 | 1 | 5 | Oct 20, 2007 | H2H |
| Anna Chakvetadze | 3 | 2 | 5 | Oct 5, 2007 | H2H |
| Maria Sharapova | 0 | 5 | 5 | Aug 3, 2007 | H2H |