H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anna Chakvetadze vs Viktoriya Kutuzova H2H: 2-0
Anna Chakvetadze holds a 2–0 lead over Viktoriya Kutuzova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anna Chakvetadze leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna Chakvetadze won the 2006 Indian Wells second round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 37
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2006* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Anna Chakvetadze | 6-4 7-5 | Viktoriya Kutuzova | Match data |
| Aug 31, 2005* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Anna Chakvetadze | 6-3 3-6 7-5 | Viktoriya Kutuzova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Chakvetadze | #577 | #5 | 2,940 | 2,067 | 183 | 135 | 57.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
| Viktoriya Kutuzova | #824 | #76 | 804 | 1,618 | 21 | 41 | 33.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna Chakvetadze | Viktoriya Kutuzova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #278 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #485 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #76 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #127 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #32 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #178 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #13 | 1,936 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 56–19 | 74.7% | #6 | 1,984 | 0 | 6 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #87 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #18 | 1,721 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #447 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #67 | 1,711 | 0 | 7 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #56 | 1,715 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2011 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #234 | 1,641 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2012 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #224 | 1,557 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |