H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anna-Lena Groenefeld vs Ai Sugiyama H2H: 1-1
Anna-Lena Groenefeld and Ai Sugiyama are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ai Sugiyama leads 1–0 on clay, while Anna-Lena Groenefeld leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna-Lena Groenefeld won the 2005 Beijing fourth round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 51
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2005* | Beijing | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | 6-2 6-3 | Ai Sugiyama | Match data |
| Apr 14, 2005* | Charleston | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Ai Sugiyama | 6-2 6-4 | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | #1,012 | #14 | 1,365 | 1,856 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Ai Sugiyama | #97 | #8 | 2,400 | 1,951 | 411 | 362 | 53.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Ai Sugiyama | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #184 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #68 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #145 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #19 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #46 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #204 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #28 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #21 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #65 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #18 | 1,859 | 0 | 3 |
| 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #24 | 1,806 | 0 | 3 |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #32 | 1,687 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #30 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #24 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 44–25 | 63.8% | #10 | 1,915 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #17 | 1,802 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #29 | 1,742 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #26 | 1,742 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #38 | 1,632 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #31 | 1,742 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #97 | 1,647 | 0 | 6 |