H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anna-Lena Groenefeld vs Alicia Molik H2H: 1-1
Anna-Lena Groenefeld and Alicia Molik are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna-Lena Groenefeld won the 2010 Dubai third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2010* | Dubai | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | 6-4 6-4 | Alicia Molik | Match data |
| Feb 22, 2007* | Dubai | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Alicia Molik | 6-3 6-4 | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | #1,012 | #14 | 1,365 | 1,856 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Alicia Molik | #403 | #8 | 2,630 | 2,035 | 151 | 161 | 48.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Alicia Molik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #96 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #68 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #47 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #19 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #94 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #204 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #36 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #13 | 1,938 | 0 | 4 |
| 2009 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #65 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #28 | 1,779 | 0 | 5 |
| 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #165 | 1,632 | 0 | 5 |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #56 | 1,628 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #308 | 1,577 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,561 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,584 | 0 | 5 |