H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anna-Lena Groenefeld vs Anna Smashnova H2H: 3-0
Anna-Lena Groenefeld holds a 3–0 lead over Anna Smashnova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anna-Lena Groenefeld leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anna-Lena Groenefeld won the 2006 Indian Wells third round 2-6 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 50
Right-Handed
157 cm / 5'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2006* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | 2-6 6-1 6-2 | Anna Smashnova | Match data |
| Sep 30, 2005* | Luxembourg | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | 6-1 6-2 | Anna Smashnova | Match data |
| May 26, 2005* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | 6-1 6-0 | Anna Smashnova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | #1,012 | #14 | 1,365 | 1,856 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Anna Smashnova | #994 | #15 | 1,616 | 1,882 | 242 | 221 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Anna Smashnova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #68 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #236 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #19 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #47 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #204 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #68 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #132 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #65 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #49 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #47 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #46 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #88 | 1,605 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 43–25 | 63.2% | #16 | 1,793 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #16 | 1,857 | 0 | 8 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #32 | 1,732 | 0 | 9 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #43 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,700 | 0 | 12 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #921 | 1,648 | 0 | 12 |