H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Anna-Lena Groenefeld vs Antonia Matic H2H: 1-0

Anna-Lena Groenefeld holds a 1–0 lead over Antonia Matic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anna-Lena Groenefeld leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna-Lena Groenefeld won the 2004 Tashkent round of 32 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anna-Lena Groenefeld
GER Age 41 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Antonia Matic
GER Age 41 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anna-Lena Groenefeld #74 6-4 6-4 Antonia Matic #227 Match data Oct 14, 2004* R32 Tashkent Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anna-Lena Groenefeld — #14 1,365 1,856 109 131 45.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Antonia Matic — #225 133 1,500 0 2 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anna-Lena Groenefeld Antonia Matic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2003 3–6 33.3% #118 1,515 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2004 7–15 31.8% #68 1,478 0 0 2004 0–2 0.0% #275 1,479 0 0
20 2005 36–26 58.1% #21 1,790 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2006 30–26 53.6% #19 1,656 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 2007 4–15 21.1% #204 1,521 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 2008 7–7 50.0% #76 1,593 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 2009 18–23 43.9% #65 1,655 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 2010 4–11 26.7% #166 1,563 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 2011 0–2 0.0% #266 1,542 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anna-Lena Groenefeld Antonia Matic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2003 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 3 9 12 25.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 27 16 43 62.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 10 16 26 38.5% 18 6 24 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 2 7 9 22.2% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2009 8 13 21 38.1% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 58 77 135 43.0% 46 39 85 54.1% 3 11 14 21.4% 2 4 6 33.3% — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anna-Lena Groenefeld Antonia Matic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2003 1516 115.9 — — — — +21 +1 — 38.1% -0.48 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 1478 112.5 +1.14 +0.30 1.285 54.6% +4 +58 — 34.1% -0.61 1–1 0–2 — +0.25 2004 1480 104.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — — — -0.03
20 2005 1790 139.1 +3.94 +1.05 1.197 53.3% -4 -165 -292 57.8% +0.52 8–4 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 105.9 +1.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 1656 132.8 +1.54 -0.91 1.005 50.2% -69 +191 -102 52.7% +0.15 10–9 (53%) 6–7 (46%) 98.7 +2.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 1522 109.9 -1.54 -3.57 0.830 46.3% 0 +226 — 26.2% -1.21 1–3 (25%) 1–5 (17%) 93.7 +0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 1594 128.7 +2.89 -1.21 1.066 50.8% -23 +139 — 51.7% +0.03 0–1 — — -1.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2009 1655 129.0 +0.58 -2.14 0.947 48.9% -60 +88 — 46.3% -0.34 5–12 (29%) 4–6 (40%) 92.9 -1.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2010 1563 104.7 -2.32 -1.60 0.865 46.9% -2 +101 — 37.8% -1.51 1–6 (14%) 3–0 (100%) 97.3 -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2011 1543 96.7 -0.53 -1.59 0.574 41.1% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1857 131.6 +0.84 -1.46 0.971 49.4% -24 +89 -197 47.1% -0.20 27–38 (42%) 18–26 (41%) 91.9 +0.46 — 1500 102.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — — — -1.50

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.