H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anna-Lena Groenefeld vs Barbara Schett H2H: 1-1
Anna-Lena Groenefeld and Barbara Schett are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anna-Lena Groenefeld leads 1–0 on carpet, while Barbara Schett leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Barbara Schett won the 2004 Estoril fourth round 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 50
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2004* | Estoril | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Barbara Schett | 7-5 7-5 | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Match data |
| Sep 25, 2003* | Leipzig | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | 6-3 6-4 | Barbara Schett | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | #1,012 | #14 | 1,365 | 1,856 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Barbara Schett | #97 | #7 | 2,188 | 1,975 | 256 | 227 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Barbara Schett | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #68 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #19 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #100 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #204 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #83 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,759 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #65 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 |
| 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #23 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,936 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #22 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #21 | 1,757 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #40 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #76 | 1,624 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,590 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,591 | 0 | 3 |