H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Anna-Lena Groenefeld vs Catalina Castano H2H: 0-2

Catalina Castano holds a 2–0 lead over Anna-Lena Groenefeld in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Catalina Castano leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Catalina Castano won the 2007 Istanbul round of 32 7-6(3) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anna-Lena Groenefeld
GER Age 41 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Catalina Castano
COL Age 47 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Catalina Castano #102 7-6(3) 6-2 Anna-Lena Groenefeld #48 Match data May 24, 2007* R32 Istanbul Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Catalina Castano #36 6-3 2-6 6-3 Anna-Lena Groenefeld #14 Match data May 11, 2006* R32 Berlin Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anna-Lena Groenefeld — #14 1,365 1,856 109 131 45.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Catalina Castano — #35 623 1,702 85 111 43.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anna-Lena Groenefeld Catalina Castano
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2003 3–6 33.3% #118 1,515 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2004 7–15 31.8% #68 1,478 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #232 1,484 0 0
20 2005 36–26 58.1% #21 1,790 0 0 2000 1–1 50.0% #110 1,487 0 0
21 2006 30–26 53.6% #19 1,656 0 1 2001 5–9 35.7% #144 1,490 0 0
22 2007 4–15 21.1% #204 1,521 0 1 2002 3–2 60.0% #194 1,514 0 0
23 2008 7–7 50.0% #76 1,593 0 1 2003 2–3 40.0% #135 1,519 0 0
24 2009 18–23 43.9% #65 1,655 0 1 2004 5–9 35.7% #113 1,533 0 0
25 2010 4–11 26.7% #166 1,563 0 1 2005 22–18 55.0% #57 1,659 0 0
26 2011 0–2 0.0% #266 1,542 0 1 2006 22–25 46.8% #54 1,543 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2007 12–21 36.4% #112 1,520 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2008 5–10 33.3% #142 1,504 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2009 0–2 0.0% #214 1,476 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2010 5–5 50.0% #189 1,505 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2011 2–1 66.7% #254 1,519 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2012 1–2 33.3% #232 1,515 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2013 0–2 0.0% #202 1,493 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anna-Lena Groenefeld Catalina Castano
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2003 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 3 9 12 25.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2005 27 16 43 62.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2000 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2006 10 16 26 38.5% 18 6 24 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2007 2 7 9 22.2% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2008 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2009 8 13 21 38.1% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2004 1 3 4 25.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 10 7 17 58.8% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 8 13 21 38.1% 14 9 23 60.9% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 7 14 21 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 58 77 135 43.0% 46 39 85 54.1% 3 11 14 21.4% 2 4 6 33.3% — 28 46 74 37.8% 56 55 111 50.5% 0 9 9 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 140/231 of Anna-Lena Groenefeld's and 80/174 of Catalina Castano's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anna-Lena Groenefeld Catalina Castano
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2004 3/22 2.3 3.3 58.5% 65.7% 58.7% 42.9% 40.3% 62.7% 48.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 13/62 3.9 4.3 56.2% 70.4% 51.6% 58.5% 40.0% 62.2% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 40/56 3.2 5.1 58.9% 65.4% 45.4% 57.8% 44.8% 57.3% 42.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 16/19 4.6 8.0 52.4% 67.4% 39.9% 52.8% 43.4% 54.0% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 13/14 5.1 5.3 47.4% 75.3% 47.4% 51.1% 46.9% 61.2% 41.4% 2003 1/5 1.0 2.0 62.5% 45.7% 38.1% 33.3% 33.3% 42.9% 39.6%
24 2009 39/41 3.6 5.4 58.2% 64.9% 46.1% 54.3% 54.9% 56.5% 41.2% 2004 3/14 0.3 3.7 64.4% 45.1% 37.0% 43.9% 46.7% 42.2% 37.8%
25 2010 14/15 2.8 7.0 55.0% 63.7% 38.6% 47.6% 48.2% 52.7% 40.9% 2005 5/40 3.6 2.8 58.6% 61.1% 43.2% 52.7% 40.0% 53.5% 41.1%
26 2011 2/2 1.5 4.0 52.6% 62.6% 38.3% 55.8% 25.0% 51.3% 27.9% 2006 20/47 2.1 2.7 61.3% 58.8% 42.7% 49.0% 49.5% 52.2% 42.3%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 22/33 1.5 3.3 62.1% 58.1% 43.9% 50.7% 38.5% 52.8% 41.6%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 11/15 1.4 3.7 61.4% 61.7% 48.0% 58.5% 56.5% 55.8% 42.0%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 2/2 5.0 8.5 54.9% 64.2% 38.5% 51.0% 55.0% 52.6% 43.4%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 9/10 1.4 4.0 63.4% 60.6% 47.4% 45.7% 45.1% 55.5% 46.6%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 3/3 1.7 11.0 60.6% 60.7% 34.9% 51.9% 55.9% 50.8% 46.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 3/3 3.0 9.3 55.0% 58.9% 33.8% 42.4% 39.5% 47.8% 46.7%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 1/2 0.0 5.0 48.9% 48.9% 46.8% 60.0% 30.8% 47.8% 47.9%
Career — 140/240 3.6 5.6 56.1% 66.7% 45.2% 54.3% 47.2% 57.1% 41.7% — 80/196 1.8 3.9 61.1% 58.8% 43.4% 50.3% 45.8% 52.6% 42.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anna-Lena Groenefeld Catalina Castano
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2003 1516 115.9 — — — — +21 +1 — 38.1% -0.48 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 1478 112.5 +1.14 +0.30 1.285 54.6% +4 +58 — 34.1% -0.61 1–1 0–2 — +0.25 1999 1484 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09
20 2005 1790 139.1 +3.94 +1.05 1.197 53.3% -4 -165 -292 57.8% +0.52 8–4 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 105.9 +1.73 2000 1487 104.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.00 — — — +0.23
21 2006 1656 132.8 +1.54 -0.91 1.005 50.2% -69 +191 -102 52.7% +0.15 10–9 (53%) 6–7 (46%) 98.7 +2.20 2001 1490 107.2 — — — — +25 +45 — 38.2% -0.88 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.9 +0.20
22 2007 1522 109.9 -1.54 -3.57 0.830 46.3% 0 +226 — 26.2% -1.21 1–3 (25%) 1–5 (17%) 93.7 +0.52 2002 1514 106.3 — — — — — +72 — 53.3% -0.13 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — +0.40
23 2008 1594 128.7 +2.89 -1.21 1.066 50.8% -23 +139 — 51.7% +0.03 0–1 — — -1.00 2003 1519 101.5 -0.43 -0.17 0.693 41.3% — +60 — 41.7% -0.92 1–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.05
24 2009 1655 129.0 +0.58 -2.14 0.947 48.9% -60 +88 — 46.3% -0.34 5–12 (29%) 4–6 (40%) 92.9 -1.97 2004 1534 115.0 -2.87 -1.32 0.653 40.4% -58 +59 — 37.1% -0.97 4–3 (57%) 1–1 — -0.75
25 2010 1563 104.7 -2.32 -1.60 0.865 46.9% -2 +101 — 37.8% -1.51 1–6 (14%) 3–0 (100%) 97.3 -0.12 2005 1659 128.5 -0.94 -1.22 0.884 47.8% -48 +8 — 54.9% +0.40 5–6 (45%) 5–5 (50%) 101.1 -0.06
26 2011 1543 96.7 -0.53 -1.59 0.574 41.1% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.26 2006 1544 112.6 -3.15 -1.99 0.886 47.4% -44 +184 -90 46.3% -0.27 8–10 (44%) 5–4 (56%) 98.5 +1.63
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1520 113.0 -1.65 -1.56 0.883 47.1% -28 +175 — 37.0% -1.11 4–3 (57%) 1–1 — -0.81
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1504 112.0 -0.13 -1.61 0.950 49.7% +4 +96 — 40.0% -0.43 1–4 (20%) 0–5 (0%) 91.5 -0.08
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1477 98.1 -1.31 +0.09 0.917 47.9% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 1–1 — +0.12
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1505 109.3 -0.80 +0.20 1.048 50.9% — +82 — 54.2% +0.13 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — +0.55
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1519 102.2 +1.09 +0.50 0.951 49.0% — +89 — 50.0% -0.25 2–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.46
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1515 101.0 -0.68 -1.14 0.894 47.6% — — — 37.5% -0.50 1–1 — — -0.10
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1493 99.9 +1.69 -0.59 0.918 47.8% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–2 — — -0.13
Career — 1857 131.6 +0.84 -1.46 0.971 49.4% -24 +89 -197 47.1% -0.20 27–38 (42%) 18–26 (41%) 91.9 +0.46 — 1702 118.0 -1.52 -1.28 0.901 47.8% -34 +95 -90 44.6% -0.41 33–39 (46%) 21–21 (50%) 97.4 +0.87

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.